A woman's rental shop in Changsha was smashed by a property company. Whose fault is this?

Safeguarding rights must be carried out within the scope permitted by law, not beyond the boundaries of law, and do something that the law cannot support. The act of angrily smashing property shops will really lead to the loss of the wife and the loss of soldiers, because such acts are too reckless, and such reckless acts will only bring endless trouble to themselves. Think about it. If you break something in the shop, you must pay the price. If you can't solve this matter privately, it may also lead to criminal offences. Because you smashed other people's things and damaged public and private property, if it reaches a certain amount, you will be punished and sentenced.

Let's sort out the whole story. A lady in Hunan took a fancy to a shop. This place is a bar and a street is a restaurant. She thought that business would be good in the future, so she rented a two-story hot pot restaurant, paid the rent, and then began to decorate. However, his decoration really made me feel too exaggerated, and it cost 5 million. However, after the transformation, the business is not booming and there is no passenger flow. In fact, we all know that this year is the outbreak of COVID-19, so many people will not go out to eat, which makes it difficult for hot pot restaurants to make money. Before this, they had already acquired the real estate, and verbally promised that there was no income to reduce the rent, so this Ms. Liang did not pay the rent, and this kind of shop smashing behavior appeared.

The business of the physical store is really bad this year, but one party has been in arrears with the property fee for more than two years, and Ms. Liang has never opened, so everyone is in a dilemma. But the solution is not violence. Ms. Liang can be required to pay the rent in arrears through legal procedures. If not, you will have to take back the store. If I want to do this, the court will still support the property. Why do you have to smash the store and make trouble for yourself?

For the verbal commitment of the property, if there is evidence, you can also sue the property and return it to the store on the grounds of long-term no income. You must choose the best solution when you do things, and don't use Lu's means, otherwise it will only lead to the deterioration of things and the problem will not be solved.