Who should be responsible for the loss of express delivery with the consent of the recipient?

Legal analysis: the recipient is responsible. The recipient has agreed that the residential property and the doorman sign for the express delivery, and the express delivery company has no responsibility. The property company collects the parcel with the consent of the owner, and the owner himself will bear certain responsibilities if there is any problem with the parcel. There is no relevant law in China that stipulates that the doorman or property management department of the community has the obligation to collect express parcels, that is, unless this service has been specially marked in the property management agreement of the community. Or at the request of the owner, the property company agreed that the two sides signed relevant agreements on this matter, so that the act of property collection and express delivery belongs to a free entrustment contract. If the agent intentionally or grossly neglects to cause losses to the client, the client may demand compensation for the losses.

Legal basis: Article 929 of the Civil Code of People's Republic of China (PRC). If the principal suffers losses due to the fault of the agent, the principal may demand compensation for the losses. In a gratuitous entrustment contract, if the principal suffers losses due to the intentional or gross negligence of the agent, the principal may request compensation for the losses. If the agent exceeds his authority and causes losses to the principal, he shall compensate for the losses.