The woman spent 5 million to decorate the hot pot restaurant, and the property was smashed into ruins. What happened afterwards?

Ms. Liang was smashed by the property in a hot pot restaurant in a commercial city, with a loss of nearly 5 million.

In 20 18, Ms. Liang, who just graduated from the university, was attracted by the investment advertisement, rented a two-story shop, lavished 5 million yuan on decoration and opened a hot pot restaurant. However, due to the lack of surrounding shops in the early days and the lack of strong atmosphere, the hot pot restaurant was closed that year, and it was delayed by the epidemic in the later period.

On the grounds that Ms. Liang failed to pay the property fee and rent for two years, the property sent someone to smash all the decoration of Ms. Liang's shop. The property showed a chat record with Ms. Liang, saying that Ms. Liang didn't start business and didn't pay rent and property fees, which caused great losses in the mall. After communicating with her many times, she sent someone to smash her shop.

Ms. Liang said that at that time, the property expressed its understanding of its own situation and verbally promised to pay rent and property fees with operating income after the hot pot restaurant opened. However, because the two sides did not form a written agreement on this, Ms. Liang's statement was not recognized by the property. The two sides will bring a lawsuit to the court for the store being smashed and the rent being in arrears.

The rent of Ms. Liang's hot pot restaurant is 70,000 a year, and the two-year rent plus property fee is not expected to exceed 200,000, while the loss of Ms. Liang's smashed shop is nearly 5 million. It must be clear at a glance who lost more. It's not that the property didn't think clearly about the losses caused by smashing the store, but it still acted this way, which is related to its overall management of the shopping mall.

Long-term arrears of rent and property fees like Ms. Liang's have not only affected the opening rate of shopping malls-low opening rate means incomplete business projects, and consumers' enthusiasm for shopping is low, which affects the operation of shopping malls and other merchants. Moreover, the breach of contract has also set a bad example for other businesses. Once other businesses follow suit, it will bring more difficulties to the management of shopping malls.

Ms. Liang's hot pot restaurant failed to open for a long time for various reasons, and her own losses were also great. It is understandable that she doesn't want to pay rent and property fees. However, if we reach a written agreement with the property management and promise to pay the rent and property fees in arrears after opening, it will not cause the consequences of the store being smashed.

According to Articles 72 1 and 722 of the Civil Code, the lessee shall pay the rent at the time agreed in the contract. If the rent is not paid at the due date, the lessor may bring a lawsuit to the court, claiming that the lessee shall pay the rent in arrears and other expenses arising therefrom, and may terminate the lease contract according to law. If negotiation fails, the property can sue Ms. Liang and ask Ms. Liang to return the property fee and rent.

However, the property did not recover the rent through normal legal channels, but sent someone to smash Ms. Liang's shop, which is obviously illegal. According to the law of our country, destroying other people's property more than 2000 yuan is a crime of intentionally destroying public or private property, and the amount is more than 5000 yuan. However, if there are no other serious criminal circumstances, criminal responsibility shall be investigated, and sentencing ranges from criminal detention, less than three years to less than ten years.

If Ms. Liang's hot pot restaurant is smashed, she can report it to the local public security organ and sue, investigate the criminal responsibility of the person who smashed the store and demand financial compensation.

The contradiction between property and owners is not limited to the commercial field, and disputes between residents and property in ordinary houses are also common.

Recently, residents of a residential area in Leshan, Sichuan Province refused to pay the property fee because they thought the property service was not in place, and there was a conflict with the property. In the video, several residents held banners that read "What can't be done, the first place to collect money" and walked to the property office. Subsequently, several property workers rushed out to grab banners with the owners and pushed them. After that, under the coordination of the police station, the two sides stopped the conflict.

Owners pay rent or property fees, and the property provides services. This should be a synergistic relationship. Why are you so unhappy?

In Ms. Liang's case, the shopping mall thinks that after signing the contract, Ms. Liang should pay the rent on time, or quit without paying it, so that the shopping mall can attract more investment. Ms. Liang believes that the hot pot restaurant has not been opened yet, and there is no income, so the rent can be suspended. In the event of sending a banner to Sichuan, the owner thinks that only the property provides good service can the property fee be paid; The property believes that there is no way to hire people to provide services without paying property fees. The two sides have different starting points and hold their own words.

Whether the two sides agree or not, it is wrong to solve the problem by smashing.

What do you think about the property smashing shops?