Case analysis of property management

I'll take the property management practice exam again. Case 4: The property management company only bears 20% of the responsibility at most, because the property management company has not fulfilled some management obligations. According to the General Principles of Civil Law and Tort Liability Law, a 5-year-old child is incompetent, and his guardian should bear the main responsibility for failing to manage the child well.

Case 6: Because the property company failed to take safety protection measures and set warning signs, the property company should bear all tort liabilities.

Case 7: The Price Law stipulates that such charges are illegal without the approval of the local price bureau. If approved by the local price bureau, the Interim Measures for the Management of Special Maintenance Funds of the Ministry of Construction stipulates that all the fees will be included in the special maintenance fund account except the necessary transportation facilities maintenance fees and the wages of vehicle controllers.

Case 9: The property company has no responsibility and the upstairs owner infringes. According to the property management regulations and contract law, property companies can sue owners for paying property fees and late fees.

Case 10: (1) The property management company immediately rectified, (2) The property management company asked the developer to repair it as soon as possible, and (3) the local public security and neighborhood offices were required to carry out comprehensive management.

Case 1 1: No responsibility. According to the judicial interpretation of the Supreme Court, property service enterprises cannot guarantee that the personal and property of units or individuals will not be illegally infringed.

Case 12: The practice of the property management company is unreasonable and illegal, because the air-conditioning electricity fee has been included in the calculation of the property management fee, and the property management company can formulate a reasonable operation plan in order to save energy. I agree with the view of the business owner that the property company is not allowed to charge extra fees. It is unreasonable for the business owner to advocate installing air conditioners by himself, which destroys the facade and causes the overall electricity consumption of the building to be unbalanced.

Case 17: The owner's statement is correct. The lobby area has been allocated, and some properties belonging to the owners should be rented out by the property company with the consent of the developer or the owners' meeting, and the income should be included in the special maintenance fund except the necessary expenses. Interim measures for the administration of special maintenance funds of the Ministry of Construction.

Case 18: This statement is incorrect. The benefit of eight households does not mean that other owners of the whole building have not benefited, but the maintenance costs should be shared by the owners of the whole building with the consent of the industry Committee. The legal basis is above.

The above represents personal views. If there is anything wrong, please put forward your valuable opinions! Give me a score.