Vacant property cost

Change 1: Encourage both parties to agree on fees.

The "Measures" broke the previous management mode of government-guided prices "unifying the world" and encouraged all parties involved in property to agree on fees.

According to the regulations, the public service charges for ordinary houses that have established owners' committees in the future shall be determined by the owners' committees with the consent of the owners' assembly within the scope of government-guided prices announced by local price authorities. At the same time, the standard of property service charges determined by the owners' committee through bidding can also be used as the standard of property service charges in the early stage after being reported to the local price authorities for the record.

Change 2: Property services are priced according to quality.

In the newly promulgated "Measures", the charging method of property management service fees has also changed. Now, the content and quality of services provided by property management companies have been closely linked to the charging standards. The only way to collect more money from the owners is to improve the quality of service.

The reporter was informed that in the future, the price departments of various provinces and cities will work with the administrative departments of property management. According to the hardware facilities, environment, property management service content and service quality of the property, the benchmark price and floating range of the corresponding property service items are formulated and published regularly.

If the benchmark price of itemized charges is set unconditionally for the time being, the Measures stipulate that the benchmark price of graded charges can be set and gradually transferred to the benchmark price of itemized charges.

Change 3: Vacant property fees are charged at more than 70%.

The "Measures" have increased the payment ratio of vacant properties. It is stipulated that after the owner goes through the check-in formalities, even if the property is unoccupied and unoccupied, the property service fee will be paid by the owner at not less than 70% of the specified standard, and the specific proportion will be formulated by the local price and property management administrative department.

The price department explained that property management has a public nature, and even if the owners have not yet moved in, services such as greening, security and order management in the community cannot be cancelled or discounted. If the owner is in the decoration construction stage, it will even produce more domestic garbage than usual. In this case, it is unreasonable to avoid paying property fees because you don't live in. On the other hand, it is unreasonable to let the uninhabited owners pay the elevator fee, lighting fee and vehicle order management fee like the owners who enjoy the service.

Therefore, after discussion and consideration, the price department proposed to compromise 70% of the vacant property according to the prescribed standards. On the premise of ensuring the normal service of the public, the interests of the owners are taken into account.

Change 4: reduce the parking fee of the owner.

The Measures stipulate the charging standards for parking services in different types of residential areas according to different situations. Among them, the fees paid by owners who already own the ownership or use of parking spaces will be greatly reduced.

Because the "Measures" stipulate that the parking service charging standard is only formulated in accordance with the principle of compensating the management expenses of property enterprises, that is to say, only a small amount of management fees are charged. For owners who do not own the ownership or use of parking spaces, the occupation of public facilities and venues in residential areas shall be formulated in accordance with the principle that parking fees are lower than social parking fees, compensation for management fees of property enterprises and compensation for the occupation of public facilities.

Change 5: Infringe on the interests of the owners. Deduct the money!

Many citizens reported that due to the developers' phased development and delivery, the residential area was dusty and construction waste hindered the traffic in the residential area. For these acts that may infringe upon the interests of the owners, the Measures take the most direct and effective measures, that is, deduction.

For example, the "Measures" stipulates that: if the property community that implements government-guided prices is developed and delivered in batches due to the reasons of the development and construction unit, causing environmental pollution such as noise and dust to the owners who live in advance, if the property management service fee is lower than the prescribed standard, the difference will be borne by the development and construction unit.

Change 6: The service "subcontracting" fee shall not be increased.

"Measures" further clarified the rights and obligations of all parties in property management. For example, it is stipulated that property management companies are not allowed to collect fees such as deposits and deposits for more than one year from owners and users without authorization; Every six months (or one year) to the owners and property users to collect community operating facilities operating income and public maintenance fund expenditure; The tenant of the owner does not pay the property service fee, and the owner bears joint liability, and so on.

For the common phenomenon that property companies spend money to contract out the functions of cleaning, security, maintenance and greening in residential areas, owners often worry about the decrease of service level and pay more. In this regard, Article 21 of the new measures clearly stipulates that if a property management enterprise subcontracts some professional services in the property service contract to other enterprises, it shall not reduce the service quality, reduce the service content or raise the charging standard.

The price department believes that restricting the quality and service content of subcontracting is to protect the interests of the owners and to prevent criminals from playing tricks and making profits from it.