Many communities are voicing the inaction of the property. Why is the property always spit out by everyone?

Residential property is always complained by everyone, that is, there are various opinions on the Internet, saying that the residential property in your residential area does nothing, but the property fee is very positive. Without paying property fees, we will use various means to restrict the normal life of residents in the community. It can be said that frequent property problems are related to the property itself and people's ideas.

People's idea is that the community has done a normal service, which is what he should do. If there is a problem in one aspect, criticize him for not doing well. This is true from the perspective of purchasing services. Now that the network is so developed, such a problem has arisen. After being packaged online, people will look at one, look at two, and look at three more, which will form information bias. You seem to think that almost all residential properties have problems. However, if you think about it carefully, these communities around you have several practical problems. Most of them are ordinary residential properties, but there is no big problem. Just because of the deviation of online information, you have a wrong understanding of residential property.

There is indeed a deviation in the service concept of some residential properties, that is, there is a problem with the positioning of residential properties. Positioning should be to serve the owners, not to manage the owners' residential properties. It provides a service. Users pay property fees to buy services instead of buying grandfathers. Now property often appears, and I am a manager rather than a server. This has led to the idea that the residential property has been spit out, because the property feels that you want to live here with peace of mind, then you have to listen to me, no.

In the past, Japanese real estate was introduced to a place. Personally, I think it is very reasonable and necessary to introduce foreign competition, because these properties in China are really infinite and their positioning has deviated. Their orientation should be service providers, not managers. Employees in the company earn the company's money, and employees should be managed by the company. This is normal, but what they earn in the residential primary school property is the owner's money, which should be managed by the owner. But now this relationship is reversed, and the property feels that it should be managed. Have you ever seen such a collective that takes money from others and flaunts itself as a manager? I haven't seen it before, but now I see it.

We must make the domestic real estate have a sense of crisis. If you don't do it well, you will be kicked out. If more than half or more than two-thirds of the owners vote that the property is not ready, then replace the property. Who should I pay the property fee to? If you want to enjoy the corresponding service, you must pay, but you must get the corresponding service. If the property can't do it, you can change to a user who can.