How did the police respond to the security guard's explosion-proof fork neck?

Event review: 65438+February 65438+April, Nanning, Guangxi. A security guard in a residential area locked the takeaway brother with a riot steel fork, causing his neck injury. Witnesses said that the takeaway did not hit anyone and there was no weapon. Another takeaway next to it angered the security guard: Good humiliate! Do you take him as an adult? ? At present, the police have taken the security guard away and the takeaway brother has also been taken to the hospital for examination. 15, the staff said that the cause of the incident was that the takeaway did not register according to the regulations and forcibly entered the community. The security guard asked him to make up the dispute between the two sides, so he used a riot fork, and there was a scene in the video that the security guard couldn't solve. After mediation by the police, both parties were at fault and reached an agreement that the matter would not be pursued. ?

? Let's take a look at the true story: because it is still in the epidemic period, according to the epidemic prevention requirements of the property company, non-owner personnel must register and verify when entering and leaving the community, but at that time, the takeaway refused to register on the grounds that the order was overtime and forced to rush in. When the takeaway passed the gate of the community, the security guard asked him to fill in the information, but it was rejected. Prove that the takeaway is not only tough, but also swearing, saying: Everything has been sent, what can I do if I don't register? After that, the deliveryman had a dispute with the security guard at the entrance of the community. This is because the owner can't block the intersection when he wants to go in. The security guard asked the delivery man to communicate next to him, and the dispute broke out again. After that, the security guard stopped the other party with a riot fork, and then the deliveryman called the police.

? It can be seen that both sides are at fault, because the takeaway brother did not abide by the rules of the community, as the saying goes? No rules, Fiona Fang? Especially in the special period of this year's epidemic, people should pay more attention to the affairs of visiting communities. On the other hand, Brother Bao's practice is also thoughtless. It's really disrespectful to cross a little brother in broad daylight. Brother Security should be sensible and reasonable. Judging from the announcement, both sides realized their mistakes and have reconciled. Warn the masses to be calm when there are contradictions, not to intensify contradictions, and to fight violence with violence. ?