The old man was injured when he followed the car into the gate, and his family questioned that the security guard should not be compensated. Should it be supported?

You should not support it. After all, you didn't abide by the rules of the community yourself. If you don't take the sidewalk, you have to follow the car. Recently, a residential property in Yuhuatai, Nanjing felt very wronged because of one thing. An 80-year-old man broke into the gate illegally and was injured by a fallen parking pole. As a result, the property not only bears the cost of maintaining the parking column, but also compensates the elderly who violate the rules 1000 yuan. Those who abide by the rules actually lose to those who violate the rules, and no one will feel comfortable.

It is understood that on the day of the incident, the old man surnamed Zhang was riding a battery car back to the community. When he walked to the gate of the community, he saw a car just entering the community from the gate. For convenience, he followed the motor vehicle into the community. Unexpectedly, the gate was closed soon, and the rapidly falling parking pole hit his head, causing his head to bleed. Seeing that the old man was injured, the community immediately prepared to send him to the hospital for treatment. However, he fell down and could not explain to his later family. Seeing the old man bleeding and still supporting on the ground, the house had no choice but to call the police.

After the police arrived at the scene, they immediately sent the old man to the hospital. After the examination, the old man just scratched his head skin and needed four stitches, with a slight concussion. After a lot of work, the police went out and found that the old man's family did not accompany him to sew needles, but stood at the gate of the hospital and argued with the property manager about compensation. After a while, the old man who finished sewing was injured in the head. He said that the old man violated the rules first and hit the parking pole. We don't allow him to pay compensation. We also took the initiative to bear the medical expenses. But he asked for too much further compensation. On the one hand, he said that the old man was injured because the property work was not careful. Should bear the main responsibility, ask the person in charge of the property is important or important. So who is right and who is wrong?

The police found two problems through investigation. First, the elderly did not enter the community through the pedestrian passage as required. Another reason is that the security guard at the entrance of the property management parking lot did not pay attention to tracking the elderly motor vehicles, which led to this incident. After patient mediation by the police, the old man realized his mistake and promised to abide by regional regulations. The property company compensated the elderly 1000 yuan. As far as Bian Xiao knows, most motor vehicle entrances are now separated by a car and a post. Obviously, the old man's behavior violated the regulations. It seems that real estate companies are really lacking in confidence. Many netizens have something to say about this. A netizen named "Shi Tian 16" said: "It's nonsense to pay 1000 yuan for your own responsibility. Regardless of age, adults should pay for their mistakes. " Another netizen also said: "I have admitted all my problems. Why should I lose money? Property fee is not everyone's property fee? Who will pay for repairing the damaged railing?

It can be seen that netizens are full of dissatisfaction with this old man who sells old people and swindles money. Bian Xiao also thinks that we respect the elderly, but we only respect the real old people, not those who do whatever they want because of their age. But in the real society, I don't know when, more and more "bad old men" don't respect their age, so that people exclaim that the bad guys are old.