A district in Shanghai stipulates that the same family "doubles the parking fee for the second car". Is this feasible?

Recently, some netizens broke the news on the Internet, saying that the step-by-step parking charging scheme released by a residential property in Shanghai has aroused the dissatisfaction of the community owners, because the scheme adopts the step-by-step charging method, and the first car in the same household charges 1.20 yuan, the second car in the same household charges 240 yuan, the third car in the same household charges 480 yuan, and the fourth car in the same household charges 9660 yuan.

With the increase of residents' income and the development of China's automobile industry, automobiles have now become the main consumer goods of urban families, so many families have two or more automobiles, and all communities are designed according to the standard of one automobile per household, so this has caused the shortage of parking spaces in urban communities at present, and the property has to think of various ways to solve the parking problem. On the premise that it is impossible to significantly increase the number of parking spaces, we can only find ways to charge. Many residential properties adopt the first-come-first-served method. After the parking space is full, other vehicles are not allowed to enter the residential parking lot.

The residential property in Shanghai adopts the step-by-step charging standard, and also draws lessons from the charging rules of China's hydropower industry. If you use more, you will spend more. After all, the parking spaces in the community are public, and no one can stop the owners from using them. Therefore, this step-by-step charging is obviously to curb the growth rate of vehicles in the community. When the owner has one or more cars at home, he should consider the expenditure burden when buying cars for the family again.

I think this step-by-step charging is a better method, that is, the premise is to obtain the consent of most owners. I believe that there are not many families with more than two cars, so this scheme is absolutely feasible. As long as the property does its job well, I believe the owners will not be too resistant. After all, the community belongs to everyone. If you enjoy more power than others, you have to pay the corresponding price.