Micro-video publicity of property decoration

Because of questioning the property theft of volunteer photos for publicity, we will use such a move to fight back. In daily life, most residents don't have a good impression of the property, but on the internet, volunteers are forced to write behind their backs. Not real estate? After the video was released, it quickly triggered a hot discussion among netizens, but there is no final result yet.

Volunteers write on their backs? Not real estate? , questioning that the property used for publicity in volunteer photos was stolen. It happened in Shijiazhuang, Hebei. Due to the epidemic situation, many volunteers and property personnel at the grassroots level in the community participated in the epidemic prevention and control work. Recently, some netizens posted a video saying that the property secretly photographed volunteers for publicity, and volunteers were forced to write behind their backs? Not real estate? In this way, I tried to clear the name of the volunteers.

After the video was uploaded to the network, it caused a hot discussion among netizens. Due to various comprehensive factors, everyone has been complaining about the property, and this video seems to ignite everyone's dissatisfaction with the property, which has had a huge impact for a time.

The property said that it had contacted the legal department and would communicate first. If communication is not smooth, people will defend their rights. After the video triggered online public opinion, the property staff responded to this matter. The staff said that the photos of volunteers were stolen. The volunteers who made the video shot such a video according to the circle of friends of the property staff. What volunteers want to express is that they have worked hard in the property and gained fame, but the property said otherwise. The circle of friends they send only lets residents know about their work, and photos are also stolen from volunteers.

The property staff also introduced the contents of several photos in detail. Judging from the last two photos, there are indeed two volunteers, but the property staff is the protagonist. After the explanation, the respondents indicated that they had contacted the legal department of the company, and the legal department asked them to communicate with the volunteers first, or through the government. If the problem cannot be solved through communication and the video has not been deleted, the property will defend its rights through law.

Up to now, the follow-up communication between volunteers and the property has not been exposed. Personally, I prefer to trust volunteers, but what is the actual situation? We should be able to see more news later.

Because people's perception of the property in real life is not good, after the video exposure, most netizens are mocking the property and should stand on the same front as volunteers. However, it is hard to say what the subsequent development of the problem will be. I just hope that this incident will not affect the epidemic prevention and anti-epidemic work.

Property and volunteers are both important forces in fighting the epidemic. I hope both sides can solve the problem peacefully.