Is it illegal to close the community?

It depends. Whether the closed management of the community is legal or not depends on the situation. For example, during the epidemic, it is necessary and legal to implement closed management in the community. If it is illegal to implement closed management in the community at ordinary times, the owners must register in and out, and the owners will definitely feel uncomfortable. If there are special circumstances that require closed management, it must be reported to the relevant departments and implemented only after approval.

Safety is one of the main obligations of property management enterprises, and it is also one of the main contents of property management service contracts. The community safety management obligations of property management enterprises include property fire management and community security management. Property fire management is to prevent and eliminate fires, rectify and control fire hazards, and ensure the life and property safety of property owners. Public security management in residential quarters refers to taking various measures, such as setting up guard duty and security personnel patrol system, to ensure the stability of public security in residential quarters and make owners live and work in peace and contentment. Whether the property management enterprise should undertake the aforementioned obligations of community safety management is completely agreed by the owners' group and the property management enterprise in the contract.

What are the contents of residential property disputes?

1. The judge found that the housing quality problems left by real estate developers caused conflicts between owners and property management companies, accounting for about 10% of property disputes.

15%。 According to the judge, such problems are mainly manifested in.

2. Strictly deliver the house. Generally, commercial housing sales contracts have housing warranty period, but it is not easy for owners to find developers after delivery, and property companies have been dealing with owners. The court held that it is the most convenient and economical for a property company to solve the owner's housing maintenance problem. It is suggested that the property company sign a contract with the developer to maintain the house on behalf of the developer when managing the handover.

3, the quality of property services is not up to standard, which can account for about 70%.

About 80%. During the trial, the judge found that most owners owed property fees because the property company failed to fulfill its obligations as agreed in the contract and the service quality was not in place. Many owners will submit photos of the current situation of community management to the court, such as no greening, damaged public facilities, untimely maintenance, dereliction of duty of security and so on.