Case analysis of "campus property service contract performance dispute" in property management

1. Should I be liable for compensation?

In this case, item should not be liable for compensation, because item belongs to duty behavior and item should not be the defendant in this case. However, if you have been slightly injured (have been identified by forensic doctors), the doorman (Xiang) should bear the corresponding criminal responsibility and be suspected of committing a crime. Article 234 of the Criminal Law stipulates: "Whoever intentionally harms another person's body shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or public surveillance."

2. Should the school be liable for compensation?

Yes, you can ask the school to bear the corresponding civil liability. Article 119 of the General Principles of the Civil Law stipulates: "Anyone who infringes on a citizen's body and causes damage shall compensate for medical expenses, income reduced due to missed work, living allowance for the disabled, etc."

3. Should the property company be liable for compensation?

Should bear, because according to the provisions of Article 43 of the General Principles of the Civil Law: "An enterprise as a legal person shall bear civil liability for the business activities of its legal representative and other staff." Because security guards violate your legitimate rights and interests when performing their duties, which is a duty behavior according to law, schools and property management companies should bear certain responsibilities according to the relevant provisions of the law.