Five Doubts about Greentown Property Group's Response to Nanny's Arson?

On the seventh day of "Nanny Arson in Hangzhou", Greentown Property Group, a service provider of Hangzhou Blue Qianjiang Community, which was questioned and criticized after the disaster, gave a reply.

In the announcement, Greentown Property first stated that after the fire broke out, the fire-fighting staff made emergency measures in time and informed the police that the fire-fighting equipment could be used normally afterwards. At the same time, Greentown Property also admitted that because of "psychological pressure", individual firefighters altered the inspection records of fire-fighting equipment.

After the fire broke out, the families and owners of the victims publicly questioned on the Internet. After the fire broke out, they did not hear the alarm and the fire hydrant did not cut off the water. After the fire equipment inspection, there were also problems such as the fire hydrant could not be opened for five minutes, the water pipe could not be connected, and the fire equipment inspection was tampered with.

In response to the owner's concern that "the fire hydrant does not produce water", Greentown Property stated that "the fire hydrant produces water normally. On the morning of the second day of the incident (June 23rd), the fire department also went to the incident site for fire detection and conducted on-site water pressure test. The test results show that the water pressure is normal. " However, it is still unknown whether the fire hydrant can discharge water and whether the water pressure is normal.

After the fire broke out, the community owner exposed the video of "the fire hydrant can't be opened" on the Internet, and Greentown Property replied that "the fire hydrant in the video can't be used because the owner doesn't know how to use it". People's Daily reporter can see from the video provided by the owner that the fire hydrant was fixed in the marble wall, and two Greentown property security guards pulled together to open the safety bolt with the help of professional tools.

Finally, Greentown Property stated that there was a 1088 fire hydrant in the blue Qianjiang entrance corridor. The fire hydrant was inspected after the incident. During the inspection, it was found that a few fire hydrants were omitted, the fire hydrant door was difficult to open, and the owner's shoe cabinet blocked the fire hydrants. After the fire, the company was greatly criticized, and the psychological pressure of security guards was also great. Some security guards altered the inspection records of fire equipment without authorization after discovering that the fire hydrant was lost.

After the release of Greentown Property Group's response, it did not quell the public's doubts about many details such as property, fire protection and fire protection facilities in the case. In some social media images, there are views that there are great security management loopholes in the management of Greentown Property Group.

It's been a week since the "Hangzhou nanny arson case". At present, Hangzhou Public Security Bureau has applied to Hangzhou People's Procuratorate for approval to arrest the suspect Mo (female, 34 years old, from Dongguan, Guangdong) for arson and theft.

Apart from arsonists who should be severely punished by law, the responsibility of developers and properties in fire safety has once again attracted public attention.

In this regard, Hou Delong, a lawyer of Beijing Dongyi Law Firm, analyzed: "In this case, the nanny who set fire has been arrested for arson, but for the property company, there is also dereliction of duty. The property itself has the responsibility of maintaining and managing regional fire facilities and providing fire safety prevention services. "

I hope everyone will take a warning and do a good job in fire control.