If the property service is not in place and the owner refuses to pay the property fee, will he be sued by the property?

It is said that the property service is not in place and the owner needs to provide corresponding evidence. If you are the owner, I suggest you look at the relevant terms of the property service contract, which stipulates what kind of service the property should provide. If the property fails to do so, the owner should collect relevant evidence and prepare to sue again. If we just say that the property service is not good and can't produce any evidence, the owner will definitely lose the case. The property fee still has to be paid, but the judge may give a small discount. However, once the owner is lost, there is a loss record.

The owner is not a judge, nor is the property a judge. If the owner has any objection to the property service, he can bring a lawsuit to the local court or ask the local competent department for reconciliation. The concepts of disqualification and non-interference mean that he can change or not do it without paying. That is to say, we go to the hospital to see a doctor and say that I will not give you money if I am ill. It doesn't make sense. I think property and everyone's property are opposite, and property can do better. At the time of litigation, the property will provide a service agreement with the owner and produce relevant evidence. As the defendant refuses to pay the property fee, he must also provide corresponding evidence to prove that the service of the property is not in place or the service is defective!

Is the property in place during the service and is the service content discounted? Third, are you in the right position? Is the property service or management? If property owners do this, there should be very few owners who do not take the initiative to pay property fees. Even if some owners don't pay, they can understand the reasons for not paying through communication. Refusing to pay the property fee without justifiable reasons can be resolved through litigation. After all, property companies have professional legal personnel. As long as your property management company can guarantee that everything is reasonable and legal, then you will win the case. If you win a dispute involving costs, you can shake the owners who are maliciously in arrears. However, the premise is that the property company should do a good job in the service content agreed in the contract, charge fees according to the agreed standards, announce the income and expenditure status in a timely and accurate manner, and regard the owner as the service object rather than the managed object.