Why do more and more people hate making PPT reports?

Of course, the public doesn't just spit out all PPT authors. After all, some people still worship PPT gods like Akiba and Buyi Gongzi, so the problem is not to write PPT. PPT is not guilty. Who hasn't written a few PPT in the workplace?

The problem is that in the workplace, some people's work efficiency is almost zero, and these people who brag about their contributions with their leaders by writing PPT are often very low-key in their daily work, but when it comes to summing up the report, whether they do it themselves or hang out on the Internet, they rely on a prosperous and empty PPT, but they convince the leaders and finally win the bonus.

What the public hates is not PPT, nor is it writing PPT, but those who get something for nothing, those who are glib, those who invite credit and grab favor, and those behaviors and phenomena. This kind of person's behavior and appearance violate the most basic principles of fairness and justice in the workplace, so it is normal to be criticized and despised by the public.

Then, let's discuss and analyze which companies are prone to produce and exist such people and such behaviors and phenomena.

First of all, it is certain that a leader who is easily or successfully persuaded by such people can't be regarded as a successful leader, because either he is easily fooled, or he is a clique, or he is cowardly and inaction. In short, a leader who allows such people to behave in this way must have incorrect ideas and a problem with his character. Don't say that a leader is tacitly considering a certain balance of power. As long as an enterprise wants to develop and grow efficiently, this phenomenon is absolutely impossible. Otherwise, real talents will leave sooner or later, employees who feel unfair will leave sooner or later, and people who lack glib words will leave. It is conceivable how far a company can develop. Even Yu, the chairman of the incident company New Oriental, said that he would vigorously rectify the entire management. It can be seen that a truly enlightened leader can never tolerate and accept those employees who only engage in vanity!

The leader is too bureaucratic, addicted to the flattery of his subordinates, addicted to superficial formalism, and engaged in superficial engineering layer by layer. Such companies are the most fertile soil for this phenomenon.

In addition to the inaction of leaders, the lack of company management system is also a very important reason. Without rules, there would be no Fiona Fang, and an enterprise without perfect system constraints would have a lot of gray space, leaving room for those unqualified leaders to operate. People can't be ruthless, unless it's vegetation. No matter how rational people are, they are more or less emotional. More directly, it is selfish desire. If there is no systematic institutional arrangement, it is not only a test of human nature, but also a foreshadowing of bias.