Job Recruitment Website - Property management company - Qingdao owners claim that pets are completely banned in the community. Does the residential property have the right to stipulate this?

Qingdao owners claim that pets are completely banned in the community. Does the residential property have the right to stipulate this?

There are more and more people keeping dogs in Xinyuan Community, Beicun, Qingdao, Shandong Province. Many people take their dogs out without a leash and urinate everywhere, which has troubled many residents. Many people in the community reported to the property that they hoped the property could solve this problem, so the property posted a notice prohibiting pets, asking the owners of pets to send their pets away before 65438+February 3 1. Legally speaking, there is no explicit provision prohibiting people from keeping pets, and residential properties have no right to enforce them. Many people like to keep pets and treat them as their own children. Most people will keep pets in a civilized way. However, there will always be some uncivilized pet owners. For example, letting your pets urinate at will in the community, especially those who keep dogs but don't tie the leash, will threaten the personal safety of others at any time and place, and make people feel a sense of fear. This fear is because they don't know when the dog will bite, so they can't relax completely. They are always nervous and afraid of being bitten by the dog, which makes them feel very uncomfortable. So when Qingdao Property posted a notice prohibiting pets in the community, many people were very happy and especially supported the behavior of the property, because those uncivilized pet owners brought great hidden dangers to everyone's safety belt. Of course, there are also many pet owners who are very civilized. When they bring their pets out, they will tie a rope to prevent them from defecating at will. This pet ban in the community is bound to make these civilized pet owners feel unfair. However, most people are very supportive of the prohibition of pets in the community, but the support belongs to the support, and the community has no right to forcibly clean up private pets. Banning pets can only be used as a personal behavior to restrain pet owners, and it cannot be enforced on behalf of the law. Moreover, it has no right to forcibly clean up pets and pet owners. Even if most people agree to ban pets, they can't take compulsory measures against pet owners.