What is the relationship between a property management company and a real estate development company? Why do you have to pay management fees to property companies when buying a house, and many freedom

What is the relationship between a property management company and a real estate development company? Why do you have to pay management fees to property companies when buying a house, and many freedoms are restricted? Legally speaking, the developer is a company that develops a residential area, builds a piece of land into a building, and then sells it to the small owner, and then he will be fine; The property management company is the management of residential areas that have been built and moved in.

However, the owners' committee has not been established in the first two years of the residential area, and the owners themselves do not have the conditions to choose their own property management companies. So now many residential property management companies and developers are the same (or designated by development companies), so there will be a misunderstanding that developers and property management companies are the same.

In fact, developers also do property management, generally for the convenience of selling buildings, with little profit. So every year, I heard that the owners and property management companies quarreled. Most of the buildings are almost sold, and the owners feel that the service of property management has shrunk and they feel cheated. The common performance is that the number of floor buses is reduced and the charges are changed from free to free. Even the clubhouse was cancelled, rented to others to earn rent, and public venues became.

Property management fees will naturally be paid. Cleaners, security guards, water and electricity maintenance workers, green chemicals and so on. They all want money.

As for the many restrictions you mentioned, it depends on what the restrictions are. If your legitimate rights and interests are, of course, you can fight for them. Property management companies also have property management laws and regulations to restrict them. It's not what he said (the public security bureau can't do it, so you have to act according to law), but if it involves the loss of other people's legitimate interests, for example, if you want to build a hut and plant a flower in the sky, you think it's a good thing, but the sky is a public place. What about a safety net? First of all, there are government regulations. Second, if all households make safety nets according to their own wishes, there will be all kinds, some beautiful and some ugly. Then the facade of the whole community will be destroyed, which will not only affect the city appearance, but also lower the grade of the whole community, or affect the legitimate rights and interests of other owners.

Now many property management companies have changed their names to service companies, realizing that their relationship with owners should not be the relationship between management and being managed, but the relationship between service and being served. Just want to completely change this situation, there is still a long way to go. )