What responsibility does the owner bear for the stolen property at home?

1. If the realty service enterprise has fulfilled its obligations stipulated in the realty service contract and provided necessary evidence, the realty service company is not at fault for the theft of the owner's house and does not need to bear the responsibility.

2. However, if the owner's home is stolen and the property fails to fulfill its contractual obligations, the property shall bear the responsibility according to the degree of fault. The realty service enterprise fails to perform the realty service contract, causing personal and property safety damage to the owner, and shall bear corresponding legal responsibilities according to law; The realty service enterprise service is defective, fails to fulfill its obligations and is at fault, and shall bear the corresponding liability for compensation.

How to compensate for the property stolen from the owner's home?

In the case of theft, the owner should not destroy the stolen scene. The first time should be to call the police, and then find the property management to understand the situation.

According to Article 36 of the Property Management Regulations, the property management enterprise shall provide corresponding services in accordance with the stipulations of the property service contract. If the property management enterprise fails to perform the property service contract, causing personal and property safety damage to the owner, it shall bear corresponding legal responsibilities according to law. If the property management contract signed by the property management company and the owner has this provision, then the property management company should make compensation according to the contract. If there is no agreement in this respect, it is necessary to analyze in detail the fault of the property company in the process of property loss. If the main responsibility lies with the property management company, then compensation is also needed.

First, it depends on whether the property company has fulfilled its security obligations in the theft incident. The security obligation undertaken by the property company is limited, which only refers to prevention in the general sense. Such as setting doorposts, access control, registration of foreign personnel or vehicles, daily patrol, monitoring and maintenance, etc. If the property management company has achieved the above points, for example, each post has a normal work record, that is to fulfill the security obligations. Or although one or several items have not been done, but it has nothing to do with the owner's theft, it is also considered to be an obligation of safety care. In this case, the property company does not assume responsibility.

If the owner is stolen because the property fails to perform its obligations, such as the camera is damaged for a long time (note that it is a long time), the door post registration system is unfavorable, and the patrol is unfavorable, the property should bear certain responsibilities (there are relevant precedents at present).

Second, look at the contract between the owner and the property management party. If the contract stipulates that the owner is responsible for anti-theft, then the property shall bear it.

In practice, there are many reasons why the owner's property was stolen, but not all the property was at fault. Should the owner compensate for the stolen property? Need to analyze and deal with different situations. If the property is not at fault in the process of providing property management services and the natural owner is stolen, then the property will not be liable for compensation.