How to solve disputes over real estate and housing heritage?

For some houses that have been sold for more than half, developers may hand over the remaining houses to property companies for management. In this way, the property company will have disputes with the owners because of the problems left over by the house. Then, how to solve the dispute over the problems left over by the property right house? For more information, please read Hualv.com.

How to solve disputes over real estate and housing heritage?

The problems left by the developers were left to the property company, which was unable to solve them. The sixth part of "Beijing Pre-Property Service Contract (Demonstration Draft)" requires that the developer is responsible for coordinating, handling and solving the remaining problems in development and construction. Ji Rujin, deputy director of Tsinghua University Real Estate Research Institute, said in his speech that the word "coordination" should be abolished, and developers should be responsible for handling and solving the problems left over from development and construction. The contract should specify the developer's liability for breach of contract if he does not solve the remaining problems.

Although bidding has been introduced into property management at present, most of the property companies that developers are looking for are their own companies. In this way, when the house is handed over to the owner, the property company must first accept the developer's house, and then the owner will accept the house from the property company. This "second acceptance" process turned into acceptance because of the relationship between developers and property companies, which led to problems in housing quality and community management. What was originally a developer's problem has become a property company's problem, thus intensifying the problems between the property company and the owners.

How to solve the dispute of signing property contract?

At present, many owners' committees in residential areas often have no clear definition of the nature of property contracts when signing contracts with property management. Some communities have signed "service contracts" and some communities have signed "entrustment contracts".

This is mainly because of the different understanding of the property management service contract. According to the analysis, if the two parties sign a property entrustment contract, it means that the property management enterprise is entrusted by the owner to manage the community, and the owner and the property management enterprise are entrusted and entrusted.

If there are problems in community management, such as theft, the consequences have nothing to do with the property company; At the same time, the client of the entrustment contract can terminate the contract at will without any reason, which is not conducive to the stability of residential property management.

Solution: When signing a property management contract, it should be noted that the nature of the contract should be a service contract, not an entrustment contract. The easiest way is to look at the name of the property contract first. If it is a service contract, the name of this contract is generally "property management service contract", not "property management entrustment contract". At the same time, in the terms of the contract, if it is an entrustment contract, it will generally be "Party A entrusts Party B", while the service contract will generally be "Party A provides services for Party B".