Should the property lost in the community be compensated?

Legal analysis: whether compensation is based on contract. If there is a relevant contract between the owner and the property, such as a custody contract, then the owner should compensate for the loss of things in the community. Custody contract refers to the contract that the custodian keeps the deposit delivered by the depositor and returns it. For the contract of free custody, the custodian shall not be liable for damages if he can prove that he has "no gross negligence" in the damage or loss of the deposit. Whether the property company should be liable for compensation depends on whether there is "gross negligence" in the custody process of the property company, such as whether there is a major loophole in the custody system, whether there is gross negligence in the release of vehicles, and whether there is serious dereliction of duty on the part of managers.

Legal basis: Article 890 of the Civil Code of People's Republic of China (PRC) establishes a custody contract when the deposit is paid, unless otherwise agreed by the parties.