The women's villa was requisitioned by the crew. Is the property a real murderer?

I think the property is very responsible, and it should be the party with the greatest responsibility, because you clearly know that this house actually belongs to the owner, and of course you let many crews shoot in it, even in the bed of the hostess of the villa. This is a very irresponsible behavior after people buy villas, and it also violates the owner's house ownership. This villa was bought by a woman in her hometown five years ago, but she never went back to live.

However, I can brush the villa I bought on the online drama, and even the woman is still lying in her bed. This is a bloody thing, but also very irritating, because I have never lived since I bought it. Instead, let the property be rented to the crew, let them shoot TV dramas, or even more than one crew. After the woman took them to court, I also understood the reason.

In fact, it is because of the property, but the property did not say that the villa was owned by the owner, nor did it discuss with the villa owner. Without the consent of the villa owner, the crew checked in and the crew didn't know the situation. The crew just thought that the developer had the right to handle the right to use the house. They just thought it was just a model house, so they moved in after communicating with the property. Therefore, I think property is the main responsibility.

You can't give it to others or rent it to others, which is an infringement on citizens' housing ownership and privacy. In a rage, the woman took the villa property and the TV drama production company to court together. I think no matter who it happens to, no one will feel better, because they bought the house with their own money, but it was cheap in the end. The house has become a second-hand house before others live in it.