A man's car was scratched in Changsha, Hunan Province, and he claimed compensation from the property. Should the property be responsible for this?

A man's car was scratched in Changsha, Hunan Province, and he claimed compensation from the property. The property should be responsible for this, because the property has received a management fee, which includes the compensation after the car is scratched. However, the property management company said that the storage fee was confiscated, so the car was scratched and it had nothing to do with the property management company.

1. A man's car was scratched in the basement in Changsha, Hunan. A man's car was parked in the garage in Changsha, Hunan. Later, he found that his car was scratched, and it was scratched by a white car. The man asked the property to be monitored. When the man took the monitoring, he found that the monitoring in the basement was all broken, and he couldn't see the car parked here at all, and he couldn't find the accident car at all. The man in Changsha was very angry and found a property. The man feels that since the property monitoring is not good and the accident car can't be found, the property has the responsibility to compensate him.

2. The man and the property hold their own words. The man in Changsha, Hunan Province thinks that the property work is not due diligence, knowing that the monitoring of the underground garage is broken and no one is patrolling, he scraped the vehicle. Since the vehicle can't be found, the property management company has the responsibility to compensate the man and repair his car. The man parked his car in his parking space according to the regulations and did not violate the parking rules. It was the white car that scratched the man's car and couldn't find the accident car. This is caused by a problem with the monitoring of the property, so the property should be responsible. The owner thinks that compensation should not be made, because the property only charges management fees and sanitation fees, and does not charge storage fees, so the scratches on the vehicle have nothing to do with them.

3, the man's car scratches, the property is responsible, and the security guard is also responsible. The man's car is parked in the underground garage of the community, and the property is responsible for the man's car. The man is very reasonable and doesn't want to adjust the monitoring to find an accident car. The monitoring of the property was broken, and the monitoring was not repaired in time, resulting in the accident vehicle not being found and the man being unable to claim compensation. Therefore, the property is responsible for this matter, because the property knows that the monitoring is broken and they have not repaired it in time. Security guards are responsible. The security guard didn't fulfill his duty to patrol, knowing that the monitoring was broken, but he didn't patrol the underground garage, causing the white vehicle to escape after the accident. The man said it would cost him five or six hundred yuan to repair the car. In fact, this money is not much, but the property can't shirk its responsibility and support men to safeguard their rights and interests.