There are frequent contradictions between property companies and community owners. How feasible is the self-management of residential property?

Strictly speaking, residential property serves the owners, but in the current realistic environment in China, the property management company has become a profiteering industry, but considerable income does not mean the quality of service. Throughout the country, disputes between owners and property companies caused by poor property management level are staged in different degrees and forms almost every day. Even so, the feasibility of self-management of residential property is still very small. Even if some communities have implemented it, it can only be a case under extreme conditions.

1, the residential area with insufficient occupancy rate cannot improve the management system of the industry Committee, which is quite common in all parts of the country. The culprit is the barbaric development of the real estate industry, which has led to a large number of residential areas becoming ghost buildings. If the occupancy rate can reach one third, it is already a high-grade residential area, but it cannot be elected by the owners. Therefore, the property companies in this case are almost all real estate developers' own properties or properties with interest transfer relations.

2. Driven by huge profits, developers, neighborhood committees and other relevant departments have curbed the owner's self-management and entrusted management of residential property. As far as the current property profitability is concerned, the lowest property fee has reached 0.2 yuan per square meter. Although the personal figures are insignificant, taking a house with a square meter of 100 as an example, the property fee for one year needs to be paid to 240 yuan. This does not include various unreasonable charges such as health fees, public security fees and maintenance fees. Although these fees are included in the property fee, because the property company is not employed by the owner, it is impossible to refuse these unreasonable fees, because once it refuses to pay, it will be cut off from water and electricity by the property company.

3. Many open advertising spaces, such as elevators, bulletin boards, walls, etc. In each community, huge advertising revenue of different amounts will be generated every year. Under normal circumstances, property companies, real estate developers, community authorities and other units will carve up. If the residential property is self-managed, then this huge cost will belong to the owner, and the relevant departments will naturally not give up.

Based on the above three analysis, the self-management of residential property will make the relevant functional departments lose a lot of economic benefits. Under such an objective background, the authority that can decide the self-management of residential property will naturally not let go easily. Of course, the above three factors are just the tip of the iceberg. In real life, it is an acknowledged fact that residential property is chaotic frequently, and there are even more heinous behaviors like ours, which are combined with various factors, resulting in the inability of residential property to manage itself.