A community in Zhengzhou is suspected to be isolated by takeaway riders. How do you think the contradiction between them should be solved?

A residential area in Zhengzhou was isolated by take-away riders, resulting in the take-away of the residential area living in the residential area can only be picked up by the doorman. The main reason is that the takeaway rider was once made difficult by the property. According to a rider, the reason for the contradiction is that one of their riders was questioned by the property to steal the owner's things after delivering food in the community, and then he was put in the basement, which made them feel greatly insulted. Therefore, I would rather have bad reviews from customers than deliver meals in the community, but the property staff in the community said that there was no such thing, and the specific reasons were not made clear to the owners. Regarding this matter, I think the main responsible party is the property. To change this situation, the property must apologize or give in first.

If what the rider said is true, then the property has an unshirkable responsibility in this matter. Although the property has the right to protect the owner's personal and property safety, he put the takeaway in the basement without knowing the truth. This behavior itself violates the personal freedom of the takeaway. Coupled with unreasonable accusations, no matter who they are, they will feel insulted, so the takeaway riders are unwilling to go into the community to deliver food, and they are also afraid that the property will find them trouble again.

As for how they solve this contradiction, I think the property should compromise first. After all, they put the takeout in the basement. They should publicly apologize to the wronged rider and express their improper work, and the rider should also show an inclusive attitude towards their apology.

Since the rise of the takeaway industry, the contradiction between the community and the property has become increasingly fierce. Some communities have made it clear that riders are not allowed to ride into the community to deliver food, which leads to slow delivery of food by takeaway riders and many bad reviews from customers. I don't think there should be a "restrictive" relationship between the property and the rider. The residents of the community have a little demand for external sales, and the riders just meet their needs. If the residential property prohibits riders from delivering meals in the residential area, it will inevitably be complained by residents, and such consequences will be encountered.