How about the Royal Garden Community of Fumin Square in Dalian (Guanshan Peach Blossom Garden)? Is it worth starting with?

The house is ok, so is the developer. . . . . This is a struggle against swindlers and robbers. It's so deceptive. Give priority to big developers. His family has many property rights problems. Let me show you the post of SouFun Forum.

Jiayuan, the developer of the Royal Garden (Guanshan Peach Blossom Garden), bought real estate and defrauded the owners, who had no way to defend their rights. The following crimes were committed by the developers of the Royal Garden:

1: Forced hoisting. Although the owner objected to this right, the developer of Imperial Garden forced the owner to hoist it. At present, there are few hoisting communities in Dalian, and the owners have a hard time.

2. Breach of contract, unauthorized increase of property fees, property fees for two contracts, and the property company signed a property fee for 2.6 yuan with the owner, and the developer made up 6 cents in the first year. Although the owner actually paid 2 yuan in the first year, it was trapped by the developer. In the second year, the property fee was 2.6 yuan, and the Royal Garden Community was not worth 2.6 yuan.

3. The property company is not CITIC Property. When buying a house, the property consultant kept saying that the property was CITIC Property. In fact, CITIC Real Estate only hired two consultants. The actual property company is Hengjulong Property Company (how can CITIC Property let the hoisting behavior exist).

Building No.4: In front of 5678 is actually a municipal road, which does not belong to the interior of the community. When I bought the house, I said it was inside the community, but I didn't tell the doorpost was between Building 56. The gatepost at the big stone of the Royal Garden promised at the beginning actually does not exist. The scope of the Royal Garden Community is one third smaller than originally promised, which is extremely hateful.

5. Delayed delivery, the Royal Garden Community has not organized the completion acceptance so far. For the existing delay in breach of contract, the developer of Royal Garden does not mention compensation, but requires the owner to take legal channels, which is robbery.

6. On the issue of property rights, the Royal Garden Project was originally a land certificate. The first phase and the second phase should have been a project, and property rights should be handled at the same time. When buying a house, the owner is told that he can apply for the first phase of property right after the house is delivered for one year (as is the contract). The actual developers also admit that the first and second phases of the Royal Garden should handle property rights at the same time, which is a fraud to the people.