202 1, the state officially canceled the property fee. Really?

The contradiction between property and owners is increasing day by day. Some inaction property companies charge fees but do nothing, infringing on the rights and interests of owners! Therefore, many owners are very angry and hope to cancel the property and cancel the property fee! So, is it true that the state officially canceled the property fee in 20021year? 202 1 how to charge the new property fee? 202 1, new regulations on property fees were issued, and the standard of property fees was adjusted. Let's learn about the new national standard of property charges in 202 1.

202 1, the state officially canceled the property fee. Really?

The property fee of 202 1 year has not been cancelled. Instead, a new property fee regulation of 202 1 was issued, which protected the owners' rights and interests and added three rights and interests. Although many people want to cancel their properties, the existence of property management companies still has more advantages than disadvantages for many owners. There are many inconvenient things, you can find a property to do. Of course, not all properties are detrimental to the owners' rights and interests, and we cannot impose uniformity on all enterprises. The new national laws and regulations have been officially promulgated. In 202 1, 1 year1month, the civil code clearly endowed the owner with three rights and interests. With the new regulations, the real estate industry will definitely have a new look in the future.

New national standard of property fee 202 1

1 year 10 formally implemented the civil code, giving the owners three new rights and interests. Owners make good use of these three new rights and interests, and the good days of those property companies with poor service levels in the past will come to an end. Therefore, for these three new rights and interests, the owners need to understand.

In the first right, the owner has the right to know the details of the property fee and the use and destination of the property fee.

Property fee itself is a contradiction focus between the owner and the property management company. Owners think that they have paid so much property fees, but they have not received corresponding services. I don't know where the property cost is. However, property companies believe that they spend most of their property fees on the construction and maintenance of basic supporting facilities in residential areas. Even many property companies often say that they can't make ends meet and lose a lot. It can be said that both property companies and owners have endless pain. But in my opinion, this is still the problem of the property management company, because the owners really don't know the purpose and whereabouts of the property management fee, and the property management company knows it, but the property management company just doesn't disclose the purpose and whereabouts of the property management fee, which inevitably makes people suspicious. In addition, in the collection of property fees, many owners do not know what items and details the property contains, and the property fees are also paid in a fog. However, it's different now. According to Article 943 of the General Principles of the Civil Law, the property service provider shall regularly disclose the owner's service items, responsible personnel, quality requirements, charging items, charging standards, performance, use of maintenance funds, part of operations and income in a reasonable way and report to the owners' meeting and owners' committee.

It can be seen that in the future, it is not the owner who asks the property company to disclose the details of property fees and the whereabouts of their use, but the property company needs to disclose the details of the collection of property fees and the whereabouts of property fees on a regular basis. In this way, the owners can not only clearly know what the property fees they pay contain, but also see where the property fees they pay are according to their uses, and whether the property fees are reasonable or not according to their uses and specific conditions, and whether the property company falsely reports the prices, etc. Therefore, after the property management company discloses the details of these expenses, it is difficult for the property management company to collect money and do nothing.

The second right, the owner has the right to replace or drive away the property company to manage itself.

Perhaps this is the right that some owners need most, because the relationship between property companies and owners in some communities has been in full swing. On the one hand, the owner wants to drive away the old property and replace it with a new one, on the other hand, he is unwilling to go to the old property and do nothing, which makes the owner very embarrassed. Although the previous owners' meeting can also change the property, it is not only cumbersome, but also there is no relevant regulation to force the old property to move away. So it was really difficult for owners to change property companies in the past.

According to Article 284th of the Civil Law, the owner has the right to change the realty service enterprise or other managers selected by the construction unit according to law. This is also the first time that there are clear legal provisions giving owners the right to change property companies. For example, when some real estate companies hand over the house, the property company must let the owners pay the property fee first, and then inspect the house. In fact, this is the joint efforts of property companies and developers to force owners to close their houses in advance. Since this kind of property company can do this kind of thing to the owners of the community, it also shows that this kind of property company does not regard the owners as the owners of the community.

For this kind of property, in the future, the owners can vote openly to choose whether to change the property company according to the law. After the owner has this power, the property company should not pretend to be the owner of the community as in the past. After the owner voted to change the property or manage the community by himself, the old property company dared not move in.

The third right, part of the operating income of the public area of the community belongs to all owners.

In fact, many owners know that the public benefits of the community should be owned by all owners, but there is no explicit provision, and the owners do not know how many benefits there are. Therefore, for the construction of the community, property management companies generally prevaricate. Of course, there are also some conscience properties, which distribute the income of the public area of the community to the owners every year. Many people jokingly call this someone else's property. However, according to the provisions of the Civil Law, the operating income of the public area of the community belongs to all owners after deducting the operating costs, and of course, the community public maintenance fund can also be supplemented first.

The above is about 202 1 officially canceling the property fee. Really? The new national standard of property fees was issued 202 1. From the point that the owner has the right to change the property, it can greatly mobilize the enthusiasm of the property, thus better promoting the relationship between the owner and the property. From the openness and transparency of property charges, as well as a clear list of capital income and expenditure, it can also effectively reduce the contradiction between owners and property.