Why are my children and I being sued?

Recently, when watching the TV series "My Children and Me", Ms. Lin of Hangzhou found that the location in the drama was actually in her vacant villa. So she sued the producer of the TV series, the property management company and the broadcasting platform, demanding compensation of nearly 3 million yuan.

Ms. Lin lives in Hangzhou and her hometown is Cixi. 2014165438+10, she spent nearly 30 million yuan to buy a villa with a building area of 820 square meters. The house was originally a model house and was delivered in hardcover. Because the villa has been vacant, considering the ventilation and maintenance, Ms. Lin signed a power of attorney with the residential property on 20 15 and gave the key to the property.

2065438+September 2009, Ms. Lin watched the TV series "My Children and Me" at home in Hangzhou, and suddenly found the heroine sleeping in the bed in the master bedroom of her villa. According to the inventory, there are more than 60 scenes involving villas, including master bedroom, dining room, kitchen, basement and stairs. After returning to the villa for inspection, Ms. Lin found that the facilities in the house were damaged in many places, including broken glass, carpet stains, elevator damage and furniture wear.

20 19 1 1, Ms. Lin sued the producers of TV series-Ningbo Film and Television Art Co., Ltd., property management company and broadcasting platform.

Extended data

Judgement result

The court of Cixi City, Ningbo made a first-instance judgment: it ordered the producers of two TV series to compensate Ms. Lin for property losses and house occupation expenses of more than 400,000 yuan, and rejected the plaintiff's claim for "the act of shooting and playing house scenes invaded privacy" of 2 million yuan;

It is believed that the producer and the broadcasting platform do not constitute an invasion of privacy, because the house involved was displayed to an unspecified public as a model house before purchase, and its structure, decoration, article placement and other characteristic information were made public. The plaintiff did not make any changes to the structure, decoration and decoration after purchase, and there were no articles involving the plaintiff's personality characteristics and significance, or reflecting the plaintiff's personal and identity-related private information.

Thesis-The first-instance judgment of the case of "Women Sleeping in My Bed": The producer of the TV series compensated the owner for more than 400,000 yuan.