A 10-year-old boy in Nanchang was suspected to have been electrocuted at the gate of the community. What responsibilities should the property bear?

A 10-year-old boy in Nanchang was suspected to have been electrocuted at the gate of the community. The property needs to bear the responsibility of maintenance inspection and compensate the boy's parents as much as possible.

1. A 10-year-old boy in Nanchang was suspected to have been electrocuted at the gate of the community. The property needs to bear the responsibility of inadequate maintenance inspection and compensate the boy's parents as much as possible. The Supreme Court said that it has been clearly stipulated in the property service that if the property company fails to fulfill the safety management obligations and the relevant conditions stipulated in the property contract, causing losses to our owners, it shall be liable for damages. This electric shock incident belongs to the maintenance inspection is not in place, so the property service company in charge of this area has the responsibility to maintain the equipment. If the property service provider fails to fulfill the corresponding maintenance and repair responsibilities, resulting in injuries and deaths of residents in the community, then the property service provider should bear the corresponding legal responsibilities.

Second, the community facilities did not fulfill their maintenance and inspection responsibilities, which led to an electric shock accident at the entrance of the community in Nanchang. A 10-year-old boy was electrocuted because of water leakage at the gate, and was taken to the hospital, but died after being rescued. The child's father said that the child was stuck in the gate, but the first reaction was to lift the door and get the child out. However, as soon as his hand touched the gate, he was directly electrocuted to the ground. Generally, no one in this community passes through this door. Occasionally, people from several communities swipe their cards from here. The doors here are unattended all the year round, and no one is on duty. So, I don't know if this door leaks electricity. I know that after the child got an electric shock, I went to the property service provider, and the property service provider ignored it, saying that it was the child who fell, not the electric shock. The child's aunt also said, how could this be a fall? A child was electrocuted at the entrance of the road.

Third, sue the service provider through legal means, and the service provider will sue through legal means and bear corresponding legal responsibilities.