When there was a fire at home, I called 1 19 to put out the fire, but afterwards the property asked me to pay 50,000 fire-fighting fees. Should I pay?

No, according to the national laws, all fire fighting and police dispatch expenses are borne by the municipal government, including oil expenses, police dispatch expenses, labor expenses, water charges and other equipment expenses. These expenses are borne by the municipal government, and residential properties have no right to charge residents. Of course, these properties can explain the situation to the municipal departments and waive the fees, because they are actually worried that someone will use the fire water for other purposes.

Therefore, basically, the water consumption will be monitored by the water meter, and every community will be within the monitoring range every month. The purpose is to prevent people from misusing fire water without permission. Fire water can only be used for fire rescue and cannot be used for other purposes. Once it is found that someone uses fire water for other purposes without permission, it will not only pay the water fee, but also be severely punished.

After the fire, the water consumption actually recorded how much water was used. However, if you want to explain the situation to the municipal departments, these water for fire fighting need not be paid, and it is completely free for fire fighting. If the residential property does not respond to explain the situation, then the municipal government will charge for the consumption of these waters. After all, just because you use so much water doesn't mean that it is used for fire fighting and rescue, then it will be used for other purposes. You can only pay for this.

The property went to the municipal government to explain the real situation of using fire water and provided relevant certificates. The municipal government verified that the situation was true, so the fire water was completely exempted. If the property requires the community owners to pay the fire water fee, there are only a few situations. The first is that the property has not reported the situation, which leads to no way to be free, and then the property requires the owner to bear the cost. This practice is immoral.

The second is that the property has explained the situation to the municipal government and provided relevant certificates. The municipal government has also verified the situation and is free of charge. But the property bullies the owners and wants to make some money on it. This situation is very immoral and illegal. The third type is property reporting, which is free of charge. However, the fire water in the community was used for other purposes, and this hole could not be filled. Therefore, it is even more immoral to use fire to make the owners carry the pot.

Fourthly, the water for residential fire fighting is the water in a separate pool, which is not received from the municipal fire fighting pipeline. The water inside is separated. The property is for the owner's own fire rescue on the grounds that there is water inside. I think water belongs to the community, so I have to pay. This truth is obvious, but a fire needs more than 50 thousand yuan of water, which is much more difficult. Even if the price of fire water is higher than that of ordinary tap water, it won't cost that much, after all, a few dollars.