How much is the heat loss?

Because the thermal insulation effect of the pipeline conveying hot steam is not absolute, there will be heat loss along the way, and the resulting cost is the heat loss cost.

But it is unreasonable to charge users for heat loss!

The first reason is that the loss has been included in the heating unit price and should not be charged again. Second, the heating pipe network is managed by the heating company, and the loss is closely related to its management level, which is the responsibility of the heating company and cannot be passed on to users.

And treat the "heat loss fee" as a joke.

A restaurant owner, seeing the doors and windows of the opposite house wide open when eating every day, went to the door and said, "You have to pay for the smell of the food in the restaurant, or you will have to close the doors and windows in the future." This is just a joke made up by the author, but in real life, such jokes do exist.

Residents who do not participate in collective heating must pay the heat loss fee to the heating enterprise through the property company. The explanation of the property company is that although some households do not need heating, the heating of neighbors can also be carried out through walls or heating pipes. In fact, they are enjoying low-level heating, which has caused certain losses to heating units. Listen, does this explanation follow the logic of the hotel owner? ! How people keep warm is not completely tied to a rope of a heating company. Residents who do not participate in collective heating do not mean that they will not be heated. Neighbors' heating can be conducted to households that do not participate in collective heating, while the heat of households that heat themselves alone cannot be conducted to the surrounding areas. Even if residents benefit from the heat loss of residents who participate in collective heating, neighbors who pay heating fees will suffer. If you pay the heating fee, but the heat loss is too high to meet the heating standard, you must be held accountable. First, the house has poor thermal insulation. Second, there is something wrong with the heating pipe. It is obvious whose responsibility it is, and what does it have to do with residents who do not participate in collective heating? In fact, the boss who collects the fragrance fee is thinking: Like your family, I cook by myself every day. How to make money by opening a restaurant? There is no charge for food fragrance, so how can we achieve psychological balance? The practice of charging for heat loss is probably the same psychology. Fortunately, the price department has given the answer: there is no basis, and forced charges are not allowed. So, let's treat the charge for heat loss as a joke.