Is it illegal for tenants to damage their second-renovated rented houses?

People with weak legal awareness are really terrible, because you don't know what they will do. Sometimes I don't even know that I made an illegal mistake, and even feel happy for my "wise" behavior.

Recently, in Chengdu, Sichuan, something happened that ruined people's three views. The landlord received a phone call from the tenant saying that he would cancel the contract in advance. Before the landlord recovered, the property told the landlord that her door had been taken away by the tenant.

When the landlord learned of this situation, he immediately rushed back to his home. But don't be shocked by what you see. The door of the house was almost completely damaged and the house was sprayed with paint, which can be said to be "unbearable to look directly at".

In this case, the landlord said that "tenants often ask for rent reduction and rent-free on the grounds of the epidemic. This time, due to unsuccessful negotiation, the contract was terminated early, the house was destroyed, and the rent and other expenses were not paid. The house was renovated by the tenant for the second time, and the other party thought it could be vandalized. At present, the police have retained evidence to facilitate future prosecution. "

So in this case, does the tenant really have the right to destroy it at will? Obviously, this is impossible!

Article 7 1 1 of the Civil Code stipulates that if the lessee fails to use the lease item in the agreed way or in the nature of the lease item, thus causing losses to the lease item, the lessor may terminate the contract and demand compensation for the losses.

Article 275 of the Criminal Law, whoever intentionally destroys public or private property, if the amount is relatively large or there are other serious circumstances, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or a fine; If the amount is huge or there are other particularly serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years.

It can be seen that the tenant's behavior is already "deliberately destroying public and private finances." If he is unwilling to take the initiative to negotiate with the lessor, the relevant departments will punish him according to the seriousness of the case.

Seeing such a thing, my biggest feeling is "it's terrible not to know the law." Let's not say whether the tenant's second renovation of the house has been approved by the landlord. Even if allowed, he has no right to destroy the house when he leaves, because the house is the private property of others.

The correct way is to ask the landlord for advice before leaving to see if it is necessary to restore the house to its original state. If not, that would be great.

There are many similar things. When I was browsing the news before, I saw a tenant subletting his rented house to make a profit. After the incident is exposed, we should not only apologize, but also compensate (the result of negotiation between the two sides)

What's more, the bold tenant actually sold the rented house to others. As a result, the landlord came back and looked dumbfounded. It is his own house, but he can't live in it. Moreover, people who live in the house also claim that they bought it themselves and lived reasonably and legally. The landlord has no right to drive himself away. The end result is that the law is enforced and the residents are cleared.

Let alone how hateful such tenants are, and the people who buy houses are not smart enough. Do you buy a house without looking at the deed? It also makes people worry about their IQ!

Whether buying a house or renting a house (renting a house), you must sign (perform) relevant certificates (procedures), keep good evidence, and ensure that your interests are fully protected.