Should the loss of property management in the early stage and the developer's subsidy be returned after the profit in the later stage?

This question is a bit complicated and should not be answered in general.

The loss of early property management is mainly due to vacant houses, many business projects can not be carried out, and early investment. It is appropriate for developers to give subsidies, which is clearly stipulated in Article 42 of the Property Management Regulations. If the property management company undertakes the old building, it will generally negotiate with the owners' committee to advance the funds in the early stage, and then gradually return them from the property management fee in the later stage.

The profit in the later period should belong to the profit of the property management company and is the result of the operation of the property management company. But it should be determined according to the contract signed by the property management company and the owner. If there is a continuous accumulation of property management fees (not profits here), it may be necessary to increase service items or adjust the standard of property management fees, and use the accumulated funds for the management of the community.