Only one family disagreed. How to realize the "elevator dream" in old houses? Is there any solution?

Rebuilding the old community and installing elevators in the old buildings is a project that benefits the people and the people. However, there are always people who disagree and don't sign, which makes it difficult to carry out the project. How to make the old house realize the "elevator dream" as soon as possible, I wonder if it can be solved through the following schemes.

Generally, households who do not sign are basically residents on the first floor. They think that if the elevator is installed, the light on the first floor will be blocked; The noise on the first floor will increase; Traveling on the first floor will not be as convenient as before. So the house on the first floor will depreciate.

And the top floor that everyone didn't like to buy originally has added value. So the residents on the first floor think it is unfair to the residents on the first floor.

In this case, the residential property should understand the specific concerns of the residents on the first floor for installing elevators, and then negotiate with other owners how to solve the vital interests of the first floor.

Generally speaking, making trouble is nothing more than a matter of economic interests. If other residents want to install elevators, they can give appropriate economic compensation to the residents on the first floor.

What kind of compensation is reasonable? I think it can be solved like this.

Give 10% economic compensation according to the local house price.

For example, (to illustrate the problem, the house price and area are integers)

If the building area of the first floor is 100 square meter and the house price of the first floor before installing the elevator is 10000 yuan per square meter, the total price of this house is10000 yuan.

According to 10% compensation, it is 65438+ ten thousand yuan. I think such compensation is reasonable.

This 6,543,800 yuan will be distributed by the upstairs owners according to the principle that whoever gains the most will get the most. Of course, after installing the elevator, the residents on the top floor will benefit the most, that is, the residents on the top floor will get the most. The rest decrease from top to bottom respectively.

As for the number of top floors and the criteria for other households to be reduced, all owners need to fully negotiate and decide.

As for the residents on the first floor, we can't "ask the lion for a big mouth", so don't ask again. Don't make the neighborhood relationship too rigid.

It is really a good thing to install elevators in old houses. Only the upstairs owners consider the immediate interests of the first floor. I believe that most owners on the first floor are reasonable people. In this way, the "elevator dream" of the old house will soon come true.

Just considering stimulating the economy, have you considered that contradictions are breeding? As the old saying goes, some things cannot be balanced by money. This is a harmonious neighborhood relationship, which was washed away by the elevator installed in the old community. I don't think this face is what the official who made this suggestion wants to see!

The reasons for your disagreement may involve the following questions.

1. such as lighting, personal privacy, noise, ventilation, safety in use, etc. After installing the elevator,

There is also the transformation of water circuits and gas lines, as well as the transformation of gardens.

3. Users use different frequencies. High and intermediate levels are used more, and low levels are not used or used less.

4. Who will pay for the investment in the early stage of elevator installation and the maintenance and routine maintenance in the later stage? Control of potential safety hazards and risks,

5 Is the cost shared by the government, the property management department and the owner, and funded by the three parties?

For the residents of old residential areas, the renovation of residential areas is not only about elevators, but also other practical problems that need to be solved urgently, such as house leakage, top insulation, collective heating, residential pipeline drainage engineering, and residential greening. Now the state supports the renovation of old residential areas, creates good conditions and shares a large part of the renovation funds. Therefore, the owners of various communities, according to their own conditions, is a big project, but also a hard nut to crack.

You can communicate with users who have different opinions in the following aspects.

1. The government now has strong support and financial subsidies.

2. The neighborhood committee actively coordinates with the owners to express the opinions, needs and suggestions of other owners. Meet the housing needs of most owners, and show him around the transformed community and its favorable comments.

Tell him how to raise funds reasonably. Effective use and management of elevators (such as payment for elevator card use), elevator advertising revenue.

The ultimate goal is to improve the quality of life and living conditions of residents.

The method is always difficult, and the owners will find a reasonable balance point, so that everyone can live in harmony and maintain their homes.

The upgrading and transformation of old residential areas have been incorporated into the government's work. This is a measure to stimulate the economy and improve the living environment. Governments at all levels attach great importance to it and should and must do it well.

It is also true and understandable that some low-level residents have different views. Only by understanding, supporting and empathizing with each other can we solve the problem.

Since it is led by the government, the government should have unified policies and plans to coordinate and solve various problems.

If individuals don't participate and disagree, they can only solve it by monetary compensation, just like demolition. However, I still advise them that in the long run, everyone may have unexpected things. In case they can't leave one day, it's not even a step. It is suggested that the elevator enter the house directly without leaving steps, so many people are still willing to participate.

It is better to tear down and rebuild the old house and add elevators. The old house can't keep up with the development of the times, and the surface painting can't cover up the aging of the buildings inside. If the times develop again, old houses must be demolished after a certain number of years.

Now the house is a commodity, and the value of the house of low-rise owners has suffered heavy losses!

Here's what I think about this question. What if only one household does not agree to install an elevator in her husband's room and does not sign it? Will the previous efforts be in vain? Solving this contradiction depends on the "troika". What about four carriages? Street, property, neighborhood committee and industry committee, these four organized units, are not afraid of offending people, as long as they are careful, persistent, patient and take the trouble to do strong political and ideological work. This is a piece of cake. Ideological work cannot be done in one day, nor can it be done in two days. By analogy, you can definitely do it 50 times. If it doesn't work, where are you embarrassed to put your head? The elevator is installed in the husband's room, and the "four carriages" will do practical things for the people seriously and responsibly. This popular project will certainly be popularized.

For the benefit, even if you fall and are saved, you must blackmail the rescuer. Everyone who opposes installing elevators knows that installing elevators is good for them, but they are unwilling to give up the opportunity to earn extra money, otherwise they will be stupid.

Installing elevators is a good thing for the country and the people. Don't give up because of one and a half objections See an uncivilized hurry.

There was a solution a long time ago, but some idiots selectively went blind, or had a rhythm here for some purpose. I think the government's solution is quite good. Adding a floor upstairs, the government promised 100% to ensure the safety and stability of the building. It is very good for countries with problems to bear the burden. After adding floors, elevators are installed free of charge, and then low-rise residents can choose to replace them with high-rise residential buildings with floors or not to move them. The construction area is redistributed to the original residents, who make economic compensation, and the houses with floors are rented and sold by the state. Is this not good? Everyone is very happy.