I am a resident on the first floor and never take the elevator. Is it reasonable for the property to pay 1000 yuan for the elevator?

202 1 new regulation: even if the owner on the first floor does not use the elevator, he still has to pay the elevator fee!

First of all, it needs to be clear that the elevator is not an exclusive part of the owner, but a part of all the owners.

It is a false proposition to pay the operating fee if you don't use the elevator on the first floor! It is also a concept of stealing the purchase, installation and operation costs of elevators.

Residents on the first floor have already paid the price set by the elevator when buying a house. The operation of the elevator is to serve the users, and whoever benefits will pay the bill.

The operating cost of the elevator is also generated by using the elevator. If people who don't use it pay the use fee, isn't it equal to robbing money for nothing?

Most communities will not charge elevator fees separately, but only property management fees, which include elevator use fees, but no community will charge property fees at a discount because the owners on the first floor do not use elevators.

I don't think the elevator fee on the first floor needs to be paid. The property law says that the waiver of rights cannot be used as a reason for non-performance, but the first floor is not a waiver of rights. It's useless. If it's the fifth floor and the eighth floor, I refuse to pay the elevator fee without using the elevator. This is called giving up. You can't take the elevator to the roof before going downstairs to work on the first floor, can you?

Others say that the first floor may go upstairs to visit the elevator, which is even more ridiculous. Do I have to pay the elevator fee to visit other communities? It doesn't make sense.

Although the elevator is a part of * * *, from the principle of fairness, even if it is paid, it should be different from the upstairs residents and should be paid less. From the perspective of equality of rights and obligations, residents on the first floor rarely use elevators, that is, they can hardly enjoy elevator service and should pay less.

Since the first floor doesn't enjoy the convenience brought by the elevator, why should it unilaterally assume responsibilities and obligations?

If you have to pay the elevator fee on the first floor of a high-rise residential area, but the first floor is affected by many mosquitoes, loud noise, poor air circulation, dark and humid rooms and other factors, the property should open the balcony to enclose a small courtyard for the sake of the owners on the first floor, so that the residents on the first floor can feel at ease!

If an elevator is installed in the old building, people living on the first floor should not pay the elevator fee. First, they don't use elevators, and installing elevators will bring inconvenience to the lives of residents on the first floor; Second, when buying a house, the residential facilities do not include the installed elevators. If you are buying a new house, how to pay the contract when buying a house?

If the elevator fee is included in the property fee, it is generally ignored. If the elevator fee is paid separately, it is really hard to accept it on the first floor. The so-called elevator fee is actually the electricity fee.

People never have to ask others to get the electricity bill. Is this appropriate? There are some so-called * * * parts in the law. Can't you understand that the unused elevator doesn't belong to the first floor? Everyone uses gardens and street lamps consciously or unconsciously, which is different from elevators. The elevator should be a part of others except the first floor.

Finally, who will pay for the noise caused by the elevator on the first floor? It also blocks the light of the first floor residence. If the old community is like this, the people on the first floor will definitely quit, and they can't install it! People live on the first floor instead of taking the elevator. Why charge them? It doesn't make sense. Think about it. You want to live on the first floor. What's your opinion?

I lived on the first floor for ten years and paid the property fee for ten years. I just found a friend who took the elevator once. When buying a house, we all spent the money on the elevator on the first floor. We paid for the elevator in advance when we bought it, but we have to pay a monthly fee if we don't take it once.

I feel that the maintenance and use fees of elevators should be separated. The first floor only needs to pay the maintenance fee. Anyway, * * * has property ... What do you think?

At present, many new buildings, the top floor belongs to the highest level of private, in addition to the top owners, others simply can not get on the top floor.

And some residential properties. Even if the top floor belongs to * * *, the access to the top floor is usually locked on the grounds of safety. Therefore, as the owner of 1 floor, there is no opportunity to visit the top floor and bask in the quilt, so there is no elevator. There are some earlier communities, which have no underground parking lot and do not need to take the elevator to the 1 floor.

If so, does the owner of 1 floor still have to pay the elevator fee? what do you think?

Moreover, it is necessary to treat the elevators installed in high-rise elevators differently from those installed in old buildings, and it is not a one-size-fits-all approach!

First: if the house itself is an elevator building, it should be handed over. But it should be included in the property fee and collected together according to the number of square meters. There is no need to list them separately.

Second: If an elevator is installed in the stairwell of an old house, it should be firmly opposed to the installation at the beginning, but if the will is not firm enough, the installation plan of the same building should be accepted and signed, and it should also be handed in.

Third: if there is an elevator when buying a house, the contract States that the elevator fee should be paid on the first floor, then it should be paid. Because the elevator is a public facility, you must share the cost, and the price you buy includes the elevator use fee.

Fourth, if the elevator is installed after the house is installed, the residents on the first floor should not be forced to pay the elevator fee if they don't want to, because the residents on the first floor basically don't need the elevator in their normal lives. In fact, it is more reasonable to pay the elevator fee by floor, with low floors paying less and high floors paying more.

The residents on the first floor are most affected by the whole building and the environment: damp and moldy walls, furniture and clothes; Frequent noise, pedestrians and vehicles around the clock; Environmental sanitation and the influence of mosquitoes and flies; Sewage pipes, manure pipes and septic tanks are blocked, and the first floor to the household is the first to bear the brunt.

So the first floor of the house is cheaper than other floors. It is impossible to raise the house price on the first floor without paying the elevator fee.

The Property Law is the first law on property management services in residential quarters in China, which regulates property services and household behaviors. There are also many unsatisfactory contradictions and conflicts in the implementation of the Property Law. More concentrated are parking fees, residents on the first floor do not pay elevator fees and property management is not in place, and so on.

It is clear that the property law should further revise the revised clauses and strengthen the supervision, management and assessment of property services. Only fairness and justice can convince people by reasoning, reduce contradictions and live a happy life in a beautiful environment and a harmonious neighborhood.

When buying the house where I live, the contract stipulates that the elevator operation fee is not paid on the first floor, but on the second floor and above, so the property fee on the first floor is cheaper than other floors. When the elevator needs to be repaired and replaced, it needs to use the maintenance fund of all owners.

In fact, many people have misunderstood the stipulation in the Property Management Regulations that owners should bear the cost of public facilities. The "public facilities" here are the public facilities of people who can use them, not the public facilities of others, including the first floor. The owners here can only use these public facilities.

The so-called public facilities and owners here are within the scope. Can you let the owners of the whole society pay the bill because it is a public facility?

It's really meaningless to pay the elevator fee on the first floor. The so-called elevator is a public facility, and the expenses are borne by all the staff. Refers to the purchase cost of the elevator. When buying a house, I have already borne the purchase cost of the elevator.

As for the operating cost of the elevator, whoever enjoys it will bear it. Otherwise, should the buses outside be shared equally by all citizens? Why do passengers buy tickets? If it must be decided that the elevator is a public facility and must be shared by all residents, then it is enough to pay every time, pay the operating cost of the elevator and have a surplus for all residents to share the dividend.

Regarding the elevator fee, there are two items in our community: first, the elevator electricity fee is charged in the water and electricity sharing fee project; Elevator maintenance fee will be charged separately.

The elevator is a public facility, and it has to pay two parts, that is, the basic elevator fee, which all households, including those on the/kloc-0 floor, have to pay.

Elevator use fee, residents above the second floor should pay according to the frequency of use.

This arrangement not only conforms to the provisions of the civil law, but also takes care of the residents of 1 building and reduces disputes.

According to the Property Law, the public facilities in residential areas are shared by all owners, so even if you live on the first floor, you should share the elevator maintenance fee, but the shared fee should be paid according to the proportion of the owner's housing area, and it is not across the board.

Therefore, the first floor has already paid the elevator maintenance fee and should not bear the electricity fee generated by the elevator not being used.

In short, I personally think that it is right for the property to charge the elevator fee according to the Property Law, but from the perspective of seeking truth from facts and practical starting point, the first floor does not need to take the elevator, so we can consider not charging the elevator fee, and I believe the residents upstairs will not have any opinions.

How to treat the topic of whether the first floor should pay the elevator fee? Talk about your opinion!

Rules are not made for your family.