Owners of 58 residential quarters "locked" the new carport outside. Why do they do this?

58 community owner? Locked? Why would they do that?

1.58 owners of residential quarters? Locked? What's with the new garage? In many local communities, in order to ensure the charging safety of owners' electric vehicles, some carports will be built and new charging piles will be installed. However, in Nanjing, residents of a residential area found that a newly-built carport in their residential area was locked. There are many new charging piles in the carport, but the owners don't need them. Many car owners pull some wires to charge their cars. Some owners even parked their cars in the corridor. But the carport is not owned by the property company, but by some owners of the community. Because of some disputes between the owner and the residential property, the residential owner locked the carport.

Second, why did they do it? The owners of the community locked the carport because the new carport was used by 58 owners of the community before the renovation. At that time, after a carport was built in the community, 58 owners paid the use fee of a tin carport, and these 58 owners signed relevant procedures with the construction company at that time. The service life is eight years, but now the carport has been renovated and all the owners of the community are using it. These 58 owners are very dissatisfied. After many times of coordination, the two sides failed to solve the problem, and the owner directly locked the newly built carport.

Third, how to evaluate this matter? For the 58 owners of the community, they spent money to buy the right to use these carports, one for each household, so these carports should be owned by these 58 owners. If the deadline is set at eight years, other people will not have the right to use the carport within eight years, but now the construction company has transformed the carport into a public one. These owners who have paid the money will definitely find this result unacceptable. Although the problem of arbitrary charges by these residents has been forcibly solved, there must be a reasonable explanation for these 58 owners and their legitimate rights and interests, because after all, these owners have paid money and should not harm their legitimate rights and interests in this way. Therefore, I hope that the relevant departments can investigate this matter as soon as possible, give these 58 owners a fair, and let the residents of the community no longer have a headache for charging.