Case analysis of property management

First, the roof door is unlocked, and the property company is responsible; The reasons are: according to the property management regulations, the relevant provisions of the property law and the property management service contract, the property company should bear the responsibility of maintaining public order; There is no lock on the roof door, so there are naturally potential safety hazards, and the consequences are obvious. Therefore, it shows that the property management company has defects in maintaining public order.

Second, children's play accidents are caused by parents' dereliction of duty as guardians, and they are also responsible. You can refer to the general principles of civil law for investigation.

Third, as for the proportion of compensation that children and property management companies should bear, I personally think it should be distributed equally by all parties, because the cause of responsibility is causality, which means that if the door is locked and children can't get on, there will be no accidents; There is no lock on the door, but if the child is supervised by parents, nothing will happen.

I wonder if the answer is satisfactory? Please support!