It is difficult to find a job in Xiamen, and it is even more difficult to find talents. Does anyone know what the problem is?

Why is it that in the era of knowledge explosion and rapid development of science and technology, a large amount of scientific knowledge and technology have not spread to all fields or corners of industrial and agricultural production? Many practical and advanced products, articles and products have not been popularized among the people? Why can't modern people master many skills and technologies that ancient people could master thousands of years ago? Why can't some employers recruit workers and find talents, and it is difficult for some workers to find jobs and talents to find good units?

Isn't everyone advocating innovation and creativity now? But on some issues (such as employment), there are no innovative and creative solutions and schemes?

Social and economic development must be maintained and guaranteed by consumption, but employment is very difficult. How can we have more work wages to promote consumption? It's convenient to spend 100% now, and it's as convenient as spending if you find a job and get paid one day.

Although Hawking, a British scientist, is terminally ill and inconvenient to move, his work speed and efficiency are certainly lower than ordinary people, but his employment performance and achievements are very first-class. How much thought does this case make people have? What does it mean compared with the current employment problem? Explain that the achievements and achievements of workers are the most important. But if a talented person has no job opportunities and all kinds of necessary working conditions, how can he have work achievements and achievements? How to know how high the work performance and achievements of talents are? How old is it? /How old?

At present, all kinds of consumption in the market have different values. Of course, a worker's achievements and achievements have different values, but some people want to exchange small wages for great achievements and achievements. Do you think a person wants to exchange his meager salary for high-value scientific products and supplies in the market?

Some unemployed people, such as designers, have created their own job opportunities and conditions and made high-level and high-quality work results (such as design works). The work achievements of talents also include very effective and feasible solutions and schemes to solve various problems encountered in work, instead of just applying a specific technology to productive labor, but no one is willing to exchange their work achievements (works, methods or schemes) with wages? Many people who are looking for talents without innovation always think that you are not here to work or to manage, so I can't exchange your salary for your job. Didn't the Employment Promotion Law also put forward the method of flexible employment?

A manual worker can do hourly work, odd jobs and a mental worker. Why not? Moreover, some creative jobs are not divided into work and work, and you can think anytime and anywhere in your life. As for how much salary you should use in exchange for the job of talents, it depends on how high the job value of talents is.

Some talents are knowledgeable and versatile, and can do a lot of work, while others want to ask them to engage in a fixed post and industry for a long time. Doesn't this make a lot of knowledge he has learned useless? Others were buried.