Xianning Tian Xiang Recruitment

Aerodynamic cars were invented a long time ago. Why can't they be promoted? During this period, the farce of Nanyang "water and hydrogen car" spread all over the country. Nanyang Letes New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd., headed by Pang Qingnian, is the protagonist of this farce. After the scientific hand stripped off the "costume" of the underwater hydrogen car, the core of the farce was exposed: without considering the energy conversion loss, the hydrogen car used aluminum alloy as a catalyst to obtain 1 km of hydrogen and 1 17 kWh of electricity. Now, if hydrogen is produced by electrolysis of water, it consumes about 50 degrees per kilometer. It is clear who is more environmentally friendly and energy-saving.

Without electricity and gasoline, is the "air car" a scam or a cosmic brain hole?

However, when it comes to environmental protection, there may be no more environmentally friendly car than the "air car". "Working by high-pressure air to drive the engine" is a "new energy" automobile scheme provided by Xianning Tian Xiang Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Xianning Tian Xiang).

After checking with the engineers of Chang 'an Automobile Power Research Institute, the automobile market got a more reliable answer: In theory, Airbus is feasible. However, compared with domestic electric vehicles and fuel cell vehicles, Airbus has no advantages: low technology maturity, no supporting industrial chain, and market acceptance is self-evident.

When consulting foreign articles about "flying cars", Auto Market Talk thinks that this technology, like "taking off pants and farting", has no commercial value at the current stage of scientific and technological development.

Lack of security

An "aircraft" powered entirely by high-pressure air needs to carry a relatively large high-pressure gas tank. For example, AirPod released in 2008? (Believe me, this is not Apple's wireless "hair dryer" earplugs), but a young French engineer? Negre developed it. The overall weight is only 700 kilograms, which is smaller than the previous minivan. However, the battery life of the AirPod is only 120km, and the car is also equipped with a high-pressure gas tank with a capacity of 300L! Compared with ordinary fuel mini-cars, the maximum fuel tank capacity of 50L is five times more!

The "air vehicle" is not like the traditional fuel vehicle "spontaneous combustion after 1 hour", nor is it like the pure electric vehicle charging spontaneous combustion. However, there is a completely different safety hazard from the mature cars now-huge gas storage tanks!

The pressure rating of a high-pressure gas tank with a volume of 300L is at least 20MPa? (in megapascals). I believe that few partners know what this 20MPa concept is. Let's take a look at the data that the water pressure of ordinary houses is below 0.035MPa, and the hydrostatic pressure of fire hydrant mouth of super high-rise buildings (the overall height exceeds 100 meters) is below 1MPa. In other words, the pressure of the high-pressure gas tank of the "air truck" is more than 20 times higher than the hydrostatic pressure of the fire hydrant! If the tank is slightly damaged by the impact, the consequences are unimaginable! Compared with pure electric vehicles/traditional fuel vehicles, the risk of spontaneous combustion is countless levels higher. You can escape smoothly in the early stage of spontaneous combustion, but once the high-pressure gas tank explodes, it will be a flash ... why brag and be funny?

Obviously, battery life is different from pure electric vehicles, and there are inherent disadvantages in safety. Why should Tian Xiang in Xianning develop "aircraft"? This may be another story.

Tian Xiang in Xianning (affiliated enterprise Tian Xiang Holdings (Group) Co., Ltd.) was established on 20 10, involving litigation 100. Cai Ye, the former vice president, was sentenced to 8 months in prison 1 year for organizing and leading pyramid schemes to raise funds. "Airbus" is of course a "poison" given to investors by Tian Xiang of Xianning. With the gimmick of "listing on the main board of Nasdaq in the United States", the original ownership will be distributed to investors.

In fact, "Airbus" is similar to the "PPT car" of the new domestic car-making force, and both have a high-profit gimmick. There are "technologies" for traditional industries. There may be a perfect upstream and downstream industrial chain to support the project of building new forces, but before mature products appear, the only way to survive is continuous financing, R&D/ publicity, burning money and refinancing. After the product is born, in order to maintain cash flow, we must find ways to sell it, but it is not easy. After all, the domestic auto market is saturated.

When the environment is bad, there will always be "monsters". In all kinds of funny baptisms, closed wallets are the first choice for investors and consumers. After all, even the products of traditional fuel car companies can't solve the safety problem, not to mention the PPT project of the new force of making cars?