For some so-called "interview opportunities", job seekers should give up decisively.

For some so-called "interview opportunities", job seekers should give up decisively.

? On the way to job hunting, job seekers will always receive various interview notices, which is naturally mixed. According to the old school view, we should cherish every opportunity, even if we don't feel it or the company is not good, we should broaden our horizons and broaden our knowledge.

I basically agree with the second half of this statement. You can comfort yourself when the interview collapses. If you really, truly and sincerely attend the interview with such a mentality, I think it's great. You must be a great person.

However, not every job seeker has this leisure. Most job seekers come to find jobs to solve the problems of life and personal development. For them, finding a job is nothing like going to parties and sightseeing. They want to survive, develop and stand on their own feet, and come to the company for an interview with this purpose.

In theory, we should cherish every opportunity, but according to the cruel reality at present, for? Cherish every opportunity? I strongly object for the following reasons:

1 As mentioned above, job seekers naturally attach great importance to every interview opportunity in order to solve the survival problem first.

The increase of job-seeking cost includes economic cost, time cost and psychological cost.

Not every interview is well-intentioned, some are traps, some are poison, some are malicious borrowing brains, some are like child's play, and some are like blind date.

A malicious interview can never make up for your mental shock by giving you a few sweets. You are full of sincerity, but you are frequently thrown cold water; Your mouth is full of blood, so the other person is a vampire; It's like you saved a Zhongshan wolf, but it bit you and bit you in turn. This scar will be engraved in your heart all your life. These injuries are irreparable.

In view of this, I will use my experience in interviewing companies to sum up.

Phased:

Stage 1: Resume submission stage? Decisively refuse to vote

1 those companies that recruit n jobs at the same time have basically given up. Don't they really want people? Now the company can operate well without losing money, not to mention? Prosperous? Come on, where did you get so many? Prosperous? Company? When China's economic environment was at its best, 240 enterprises were born every day, and 160 enterprises closed down every day, not to mention the worsening economic environment.

People who have been recruiting for a position for several months or even a year and a half, give up. It is estimated that hr has nothing to do with the position. They will give you a so-called? Electric surface? Pretending to be a professional and never hearing from you again? I happened to meet a position and asked me 1 years ago? Electric surface? , looking for me now? Electric surface? How dare you regard me as a tool to practice oral English? . . . . .

3 The company profile is too grandiose: N-paragraph boasting? Corporate culture and company prospects are bright? Something like that? Job seekers should also think: since your company is so powerful, why did everyone run away?

There is no hr contact information in the company profile.

5 appear in the company profile? If you are not hired, you will not be notified, and you will not be invited to call? In other words, it shows that the company has never even read the Labor Law, and the bully style is obvious. The company is self-centered and its internal management is paternalistic in nine cases out of ten. If you are accepted, can you stand the corporate culture of such a company?

6 Inconsistent job advertisement information: For example? Education requirements? Write junior college? Working years? I wrote a column for a year, but in the specific description, it says? Bachelor degree or above, working for more than three years? It shows that this company must have released this advertisement with a casual and perfunctory attitude.

The second stage: receive a phone call to inform the interview.

Don't be too happy at this time, there are many interview notices, which are essentially? Play with you? Of:

1 asked you? Did you find a job?

2. The other party is frivolous and arrogant.

Ask a few more questions, and the other person will soon get impatient.

I asked you directly as soon as I came up? Why did you leave your job? about

In your speech, you were not satisfied with your work experience at all and asked you some questions, such as? Do you think your resume is not very good? 、? Your job content sounds quite simple. Can you tell me more about it? Questions like that? If hr only uses resumes? Does it look nice? As an evaluation standard, it shows that firstly, hr can't analyze and think; Second, hr itself has an emotional tendency. As for the latter question, I don't think this is what hr should ask. As an hr who doesn't know the specific business, you only need to make a general confirmation of your resume experience, and there is no need to ask in detail. It's not your job, it's the responsibility of the department head. Stay out of it.

At this stage, if hr asks for a telephone interview and asks your opinion, you can say? I'm a little inconvenient now Can you arrange another time? ? First, buy yourself time; The second is to confirm whether the other party contacts according to the resume, rather than randomly? Now, some hr jobs are the same as telemarketing. As long as they have their names and mobile phone numbers, they will make a phone call, whether the person is dead or alive. Anyway, these people must have a bunch of contact information, just pick a few by phone.

The third stage: email notification interview

You must never feel that the other person is very formal and full of tenderness and sweetness.

Indeed, the general formal practice is really: after the telephone notification is completed, it will be notified by official mail.

However, our country's companies have always been very strong in shanzhai ability. Many companies have learned this set of things, thinking? Informal company? Pass? Send an email to inform people to come for an interview? You can be. Regular company? Yes But this is just an example? These companies have reversed the causal relationship. But it also inadvertently left more clues for job seekers to screen companies:

1 How many recipients? This method is so clumsy that job seekers can see at a glance that it is a poor company that casually notifies people to interview.

The recipient is blank, that is to say, the other party sends the mail in the form of bcc? This behavior is tantamount to? There is no money here, 320? , the adverse effects are the same as the first one.

I don't have your name in my head, just? Hello? Two words, and the interview time is' Yes? Like we talked about before? So it is basically certain that this is a template that has been rotted by countless people? Even? Interview time? And then what? Name? Too lazy to change, it can be seen that the other hr is really too lazy to grow maggots, and then combined with 1 and 2, decisively refused.

4 Even if you search by name, don't be happy, you may meet a slightly diligent HR; Of course, it does not rule out the situation that someone especially appreciates you and needs you. This probability is similar to the probability that you are hit by a pie while walking in the street.

5 80% of the email content is promoting your own business? Bragging about how strong and powerful you are? Great, glorious and correct? The interview notice emails of some small private enterprises are written like the business plans of large formal foreign enterprises, and they are everywhere introducing how good the enterprises are. This kind of mail is very confusing. I met one. If you haven't visited it on the spot, you will definitely think that it is an upper-class regular foreign company, but if you visit it on the spot, it is a suburb with five floors, no elevators and roads or farmland all around.

At this point, you can make a simple judgment: did the hr of the other party show your resume to the person in charge of the employing department first, and did the person in charge of the other party read your resume before informing you of the interview? If not, it will be fruitless, even if you go to the interview, there will be no result.

Although we are in an era of information explosion, at first glance, there is a lot of information, but there is little effective information and real information? For example, in a small pond, there are four fish, two males and two females, and the probability of their pairing is p1; There are 1000 males and 1000 females in Bihai, Wan Li, and the probability of their pairing is P2. Finally, P 1 is much larger than P2, because in the sea, everyone thinks there are many opportunities, so they don't take it seriously, while in the pond, there are only a few opportunities for each other.

So both the recruiter and the applicant actually have a lot of invalid information? Recruiters must not think that there are not enough people. When your company is going to die, it's time for you to pay for your blind confidence. Applicants should never think that there are vacancies and opportunities everywhere because they have robbed a lot of recruitment positions. In fact, in the current recruitment website, if the effective information accounts for1100, it will burn high incense.

This also leads to an additional conclusion: opportunities in big cities are not necessarily many, and opportunities in small cities are not necessarily few. The key is to see? Pairs? Probability, and this probability will be much greater in small cities? Friends who live in small cities can choose to develop in small cities, and the result is that everyone will either have no food together or eat capitalist food together. Risotto? . And finally? More losses? Situation? It directly caused the overall wage level in big cities to drop sharply, and you can't escape yourself, really? Are you in trouble together? . Besides, wages in big cities are not necessarily high, and even if they are high, the price level is also high. Rent, food, clothing, housing and transportation, water, electricity and coal, which cost nothing, offset two, which is equivalent to leaving in vain.

Finally, I want to say: the interview is very predestined.

The above items are a summary of personal experience. If you encounter similar situations, you can compare them one by one. We must refuse decisively, otherwise it will only hurt your heart and your money.

;