What should you do if you encounter difficult problems during recruitment?

Eight "taboos" in job interviews

Many people have this misunderstanding about interviews: The first test of the interview is appearance; the second test is eloquence. I think that apart from the special requirements of special industries, the above two aspects are far from enough. For example, if a knowledge-based employer recruits employees who only have appearance and eloquence but no real skills, it will be like buying a vase. Nowadays, many young job seekers think that they have good appearance and eloquence. They think that if they can "answer fluently" in front of the examiner, they can get enough "impression points." Unexpectedly, it is precisely this number of people who are most likely to be rejected by the employers I mentioned earlier. The reason is very simple. Today, when knowledge is paramount, employers will never consider employing such people who are frivolous on the outside and unrealistic on the inside. In other words, because you deliberately showed off your eloquence and failed to control your mouth, as a result, while you were eager to express yourself, you also fully exposed your weakness of shallow knowledge. In the end, it was your mouth that misled you. For this reason, we must pour some cold water on those who think that they can win a successful job search through their eloquence, and at the same time point out the following 8 "taboos" for job seekers.

The "me-centered" rhetoric about your experience and abilities during the interview must be concise and to the point, and should be limited to the limit. Do not talk endlessly, brag, or even indiscriminately as if you were opening up a chat box. The earth “takes me as the master”. Job seekers should be practical and concise, and should not make too many verbal promises. Talking too much can easily arouse the examiner's resentment. During the interview, the examiner often asks you to demonstrate your talents on the spot. You can give it a try modestly, but don't rush to claim that this is no problem and that is easy before you take action. If you seem to be boasting, you must be careful in job interviews.

Yes, the interviewer in charge of recruitment attaches great importance to the assessment of your ability, but he will be more cautious towards you during the interview, aiming to allow you to fully demonstrate yourself. At this time, if you want to "talk" the examiner to confusion, ramble on, talk about irrelevant topics, or even brag about your "network of connections", and you are also complacent, for fear that others will not know how much energy you have, then the examiner I will definitely think that you are just a person who can only pull big flags and make tiger skins. You are extremely shallow and your abilities are "no more than that".

In the final analysis, rhetoric is to avoid the essence of the problem, so it uses dishonest and frank flattery to cover up oneself. For example, job seekers are often asked by examiners why they lost their past jobs. In order to avoid the topic, some people deliberately talk about their ideals and ambitions or that their past work and studies are useless. If they really can't pass the test, He was very bitter about his past workplace. The implication was that the temple of his old workplace was too small to accommodate a great monk like him. Faced with such a bombastic interviewer, the examiner will most likely have this reaction in his mind: Who do you think you are? This temple does not need a flashy "big monk" like you.

Can’t wait to talk or argue. In order to win the favor of the examiner, some job seekers will try to “conquer” the other party through language “offensive”. This kind of person has a strong desire for self-expression. During the interview, he doesn't care whether the examiner buys his account or not. He can't wait to open up the "battlefield" without saying more than three or two sentences, show off his eloquence, and strive to be "fluent in language". "Opportunities" to gain the upper hand and conquer the opponent in matters of affairs. Mainly manifested in grabbing words, interjecting, arguing, etc.

It cannot be said that those who love to talk or interrupt are shallow people, but people often hate this kind of "no talking" phenomenon. Therefore, during a job interview, no matter how outstanding your own opinions are, no matter how biased other people's views or opinions are on you, you must not interrupt before the other person has finished speaking. This is also the most basic respect for the examiner. . Even if the examiner's words are too biased, it means that the examiner has already held a prejudice against you. At this time, no matter how much you interrupt or grab the conversation, it will not help. It will only increase people's dislike of you.

The "move" of interjecting and grabbing the conversation is nothing more than arguing or arguing.

For example, does the unit have 24-hour hot water supply? Are there bathrooms in the office? Whether the unit usually organizes travel for everyone, etc. These may ruin a good interview.

Condescending This is the most common problem for people who are arrogant and arrogant. I have to admit that this kind of person may have some capital that is superior to others, but this capital is likely to appear "lightweight" because of your arrogance. The ancients said that "thick accumulation makes little progress" and "hiding it deeply is not revealed". This is the true accumulation of capability capital. No matter how much capital you have, you are still in a subordinate position when applying for a job. Talking about how rich your experience is in front of the examiner just shows that you lack education and don't take others seriously, and you dare to offend anyone. Most of the job seekers who are arrogant have an inexplicable desire to control and want to suppress others in order to show their advantages. However, if you go to an interview with this kind of mentality, the examiner has the power to kill the students. If you let him listen respectfully to your "pointing out the country", won't the fire of ignorance in his heart start to roar? If you offended the examiner, why are you interviewing?

Abuse of fashion words It is not a bad thing for young people to pursue fashion, but fashion reflects a person's rebellion against reality from a certain perspective. Some young people have relatively average knowledge and ability, but they are very fascinated by fashion. They always like to use fashionable terms in their daily conversations. As a result, during job interviews, they are as careless as "blowing bubbles online" and frequently use very fashionable Internet fashion terms. "Talk about topics" with the examiner, thinking that doing so can not only make up for your lack of knowledge and ability, but also make the examiner think that you are "avant-garde" and very pleasant, so you will be hired. As everyone knows, most people who dare to be examiners are not fuel-efficient lamps. How can your frivolous language block his sharp insight? In addition, some people have learned half a bucket of foreign languages ??and like to mix in one or two English words from time to time during interviews to show off their English ability. However, it is very dangerous to show off like this: if you meet the examiner and immediately use English and If you take the blame, wouldn't you just shoot yourself in the foot?

Pour out grievances regardless of the target. Job hunting is not a grievance meeting, let alone a relief meeting. Some job seekers do not position themselves correctly during the interview. When people ask questions, they use the opportunity to express their bitterness when answering. They have experienced such misfortunes and cannot bear the heavy burden of their families. They think that they can do this. Arouse the sympathy of the examiner, but not only will this not get sympathy from others, but it will also turn people off! Everyone has bad luck sometimes. Some people have poor psychological endurance. They sigh and lament when something bad happens to them, complain about the unfairness of the world all day long, and appear to be bitter and resentful. You may be able to gain sympathy from others by doing this, but if you apply this technique wishfully to a job interview, you will definitely fail miserably. Of course, the examiner also has sympathy, but a competent examiner will never abuse this sympathy. Whenever someone complains during the interview, the examiner will usually nod without saying a word and seem to be listening to you patiently. When you finish complaining, the examiner will tell you with enthusiasm at best: Please Go back and wait for notification. This "waiting" may be in what year or month?