Some enterprises should look at the horoscope first when recruiting people. Is it really just an excuse?

If a company wants to look at the horoscope first when recruiting, it is actually trying to make things difficult for job seekers and let them retreat. It is the fact that this job seeker does not meet a requirement of the enterprise that creates such an excuse to dismiss the job seeker. But I think it is very unreliable for such enterprises to use such means. If it's not appropriate, you can just say so. There is no need to use such an excuse to escape.

Although the constellation blood type can reflect a person's personality to a certain extent, this statement is still inconclusive and still under study. This is not a decisive factor, but only one aspect. For example, cancer people are sensitive, so a large number of people are indeed sensitive, but a general direction does not say that as long as they are cancer people, they must be sensitive to blx. Therefore, I think it is very unscientific to screen talents with heart, and it will also cause a large number of brain drain in enterprises.

This is actually a hidden workplace discrimination. I think some people can trust the constellation or tarot card, because it is only a personal choice, but if you use it to screen talents in enterprises, it will be somewhat unreliable. Because childlike innocence with the same characteristics will have different personality characteristics, it is necessary to look at skills and talents to select talents, not the horoscope. This is not only unfair to many candidates, but also creates a psychological gap for some candidates, because some people have really good abilities, but they are rejected by the company because of the constellation, and they will feel a little inferior in future job hunting. So I think everyone should be given equal opportunities to play by themselves, instead of judging everyone with constellations.