Interviewer: How to judge the development potential of candidates?

The applicant's evaluation and explanation of the industry and market can reveal some information to the interviewer. Through observation, the interviewer can determine whether the applicant has excellent language expression skills, logical thinking skills and analytical skills. The applicant's work knowledge can also be seen from his courage and innovative ideas. By understanding the applicant's understanding of the industry, his/her own development direction, market analysis ability and market sensitivity, we can effectively analyze whether he meets the job requirements and whether the position is suitable for his personal development. Keywords: Logical thinking ability Analytical ability Work experience This is a question often asked by interviewers during the interview process. It mainly examines the applicant's ability in the following aspects: Logical thinking ability. Expounding personal opinions can fully demonstrate a person's logical thinking ability. People with strong logical thinking ability can often grasp more useful information in the industry and make some innovative moves. Analytical skills. The interviewer can ask questions to understand the applicant's understanding and prediction of the prospects of the industry, and then compare the depth and breadth of the knowledge he possesses with the applicant's understanding of the industry, thereby judging the applicant's understanding of the industry and analytical ability. Work experience. Work experience mainly reflects the applicant's understanding of the industry. For example, in the automobile industry, in addition to being familiar with the company's brands, whether the applicant also pays attention to and understands other brands. Whether you have sensitivity to the industry is also one of the key items to examine for candidates. 1. The applicant talks in general terms, and what he says is well known, without any innovation. This is the most common way of answering this question. When many applicants answer this question, they only explain it from the surface, and their answers are all obvious. Content, for example: The interviewer asked: "What do you think of the service industry?" The applicant answered: "I think the service industry uses a sincere attitude to provide people with the help they need, and treats customers as our God." If the answer was in the 1980s, the understanding would be relatively profound. But in today's fierce competition in various industries, this answer is already known to everyone. Therefore, the applicant's answer lacks depth and seems to be muddling through. Faced with such an applicant, the interviewer can further examine his understanding of the industry in details, such as: "If you are hired, what is your work plan?" Conclusion: The applicant does not have a deep understanding of the industry and has no analytical skills. Same as work experience. Analytical ability refers to the ability to divide a thing, a phenomenon, or a concept into simpler components, find out the essential attributes of these contents and their relationships, and conduct individual analysis, discrimination, observation, and research. A seemingly complex problem will become simplified and regularized after rational thinking, and can be answered easily and smoothly. This is the charm of analytical ability. 2. The applicant's answers tend to be horizontal, with breadth but not depth. The applicant lacks a certain depth when answering this question, but he has a broad understanding of related industries and marginal industries in this industry. For example: At an on-site recruitment meeting at a car 4S store, a young man answered that in addition to being familiar with the brands and models of his company's cars, he also had a certain understanding of the models of other brands of cars. However, after in-depth questioning, the interviewer found that he knew very little about some more professional knowledge such as car ground clearance, suspension methods, etc. This shows that the applicant is concerned about the automotive industry market, but he has relatively little professional knowledge. weak. At this time, the interviewer should pay attention to the characteristics of the recruitment position. If the company is recruiting sales personnel, then such an applicant is more suitable; if the company is recruiting maintenance personnel, then his existing industry knowledge will be suitable for him. Jobs are of less practical help. Conclusion: The applicant's logical thinking is too single, and he has certain analytical abilities, but lacks work experience. 3. The applicant has put forward many opinions recognized by the industry. Such answers can show that this type of applicant has a certain awareness of the industry. If the views put forward by the applicant are the latest judgments in the industry at the recent stage, it means that he has continued attention to the industry.

◎Whether the applicant has a certain depth of understanding of the industry can reflect the applicant's development direction and work interests. ◎In an industry, the information that applicants learn is synchronized with the latest market information or has a certain degree of predictability. Interviewers should pay attention to such applicants.