The security guard of Shanghai Bank took away the ice cream given by the government to front-line employees. Why is it controversial?

Because the bank security guard will eat ice cream in one pot, which is really incomprehensible. In order to alleviate the unbearable heat of outdoor workers, many places have begun to set up love freezers, which contain cold drinks and ice cream for these workers to take. Hot summer days can make everyone feel cool and warm inside, but I didn't expect a love freezer in Shanghai to cause controversy among netizens.

As can be seen from the video, two people are holding a foam box around the love freezer and constantly putting ice cream into it. Someone came, and one of them put the lid on the foam box and left without hesitation. You know, the ice cream in the love freezer is for all outdoor workers and is provided by the government. Most people usually just take one and leave the rest of the ice cream to others. Never seen this before? No wonder people feel wronged.

After the incident was exposed, the bank involved responded that it was investigating. Obviously, it is something that can be easily solved by simply asking a question. What is even more difficult to understand is that there is still no investigation result a few days after the incident. In fact, it is not difficult for us to judge from the incident that the security guards probably want to take advantage of it and feel that free things are not taken for nothing. After all, even if? Tools of crime? Everything is prepared in advance, and judging from his skillful movements, it seems that it is not the first time to do such a morally corrupt thing.

In fact, love freezers in other parts of China have encountered similar problems. For example, some people washed their hands and feet with ice water inside, and some people moved the whole box away. The overall reason is that the quality of the people is uneven, that is, the so-called mouse excrement has broken a pot of porridge. Although some people want to do good deeds, they are chilling by these immoral people, losing the minimum mutual trust, and they don't want to do it. The point is that these people's actions only violate the moral bottom line, not legal issues, which really makes people helpless.