The trap of the interview is to eat fruit.

The trap of the interview is to eat fruit.

The trap of interview is to eat fruit, and the details can reflect a person's personality. In the workplace, first impressions are very important. If you don't study step by step, you won't achieve anything. Try to adjust and relax when the pressure is too great. In the workplace, it is important to eat fruit in the trap of interview.

The trap of eating fruit in the interview 1 I recently read a news report that a company in a certain place in Hubei recently conducted a recruitment interview, and none of the 30 applicants passed the fruit examination questions specially set by them.

It is said that the situation is like this: during the exam, candidates are in a room, and there is a small dish of fruit on each table. The examiner was deliberately late for the exam 10 minutes. During the waiting process, the on-site reception staff told the candidates: "The examiner is in a hurry and may be late. You can have some fruit and have a rest. " As a result, all the candidates were sitting still and no one dared to move. The standard answer designed by the examiner is: students pick up fruits, distribute them to the examiner and other candidates, and then eat some naturally. "If one person can do it, we will get a score of 100, but all the students will get a zero on this topic." The examiner said.

Although it is a bit unsatisfactory for students who dare not eat fruit, they may lose points, but the "standard answer" that the examiner hopes to achieve is impossible in a real interview.

It should be said that there are many cases in which candidates don't eat fruit, but it is understandable on the whole. "When the interview teacher invited me to eat fruit, I felt so warm and kind, but I was embarrassed to eat it. If I really eat it, will the interview teacher think that I take the pleasantries as true, and the impression is not bad at once? " An application student said. If someone really eats it, will the examiner feel that the candidates can't resist the temptation? Another candidate said that she was very nervous at that time, so she just answered the examiner's questions and didn't realize that eating fruit was also an exam question. However, she admits that even if she would eat fruit at that time, she would not think of giving it to other students and examiners. (Will this make the examiner feel that candidates lack the attitude of sharing and can't work with colleagues? )

People with a little social experience generally choose not to eat fruit. Because the examiner may come in at any time, I saw you chewing fruit at first sight. What was it like? Wouldn't it be rude to stand up and say hello at dinner? So it is more appropriate to choose not to eat. As for the examiner's hope, he can also pick up the fruit and give it to the examiner and other candidates. This is even more difficult to do, because it is already a bit of a master. Eat what's on the plate in front of him at most.

In addition, for example, the fruit of the examiner is equivalent to the cheese on the plate. As a candidate, how dare you touch the examiner's cheese? Moreover, how dare candidates grab the host's eye and lend others the examiner's cheese? It can be seen that the examination questions given by such examiners are biased.

Therefore, this kind of interview question is too subjective. It is a trap set by the examiner for the interviewer and deliberately digs a hole. Verification of real strength will not do this.

The shortcoming of this "behavior test" given by the examiner is that it only starts from the examiner's point of view and does not put itself in the examinee's shoes. News Network also reported that the Politburo invited famous scholars to give lectures at the Central Committee and learn relevant legal and economic expertise. Here, the author makes a hypothesis. Famous scholars are invited to a meeting by the leaders of the Political Bureau. Will they pick up the fruit on the table and eat it first when the leaders are about to have a meeting? I'm afraid it may not be possible or the best.

Of course, examiners can take eating fruit as an additional topic: if someone can eat fruit, especially for examiners and candidates, it can be used as a basis for extra points. For not eating fruit, it should not be used as a standard of poor performance, and it should not be scored as zero.

Dare you eat fruit in front of the examiner?

Netizens said that eating does not conform to the traditional etiquette culture, and the recruitment unit said that daring to eat proves that the comprehensive quality is good.

If the examiner is late for a job search, there is a plate of fruit in front of you. Will you eat it? Will you actively share the applicant's free fruit with others?

A few days ago, an online post triggered a heated discussion among job seekers. According to the post, in the recruitment of a cultural unit in Hubei, the examiner knocked down more than 30 graduate students with a plate of fruit. The reason is that job seekers who dare not eat fruit are under great pressure and their communication skills are unqualified.

Recruitment: 30 students try all the "fruit traps" first

In the sprint stage of fresh graduates looking for jobs, an interview reminder net post is particularly popular.

According to the net post, this month, there was an unprecedented "fruit trap" in the recruitment of Hubei Academy of Fine Arts Cultural Development Co., Ltd., whether it was the initial test or the second test, to examine the psychology and adaptability of the candidates.

It is reported that the company recruits four administrative assistants with graduate degrees. In the initial test, more than 30 graduate students went to the company. However, the receptionist told the candidates that the examiner was in a hurry and might come a little late, so he could have some fruit and have a rest. However, within 10 minutes when the examiner was "late", none of the more than 30 applicants dared to touch a small plate of fruit on the table.

The' 4 candidates who finally entered the re-examination encountered the "fruit problem" again.

It is said that during the interview with four examiners, the examiners repeatedly told the students to "eat some fruit", but none of them followed the examiner's advice.

Objective: To test the ability of communication and sharing under pressure.

In fact, the fruit on the table is just a hidden exam question for the recruiting unit. The recruiting unit wants to know the comprehensive quality of the applicant's state, mood, problem-solving ability and so on through the applicant's attitude towards fruit.

Yin Chuanyin, the company's general manager and head of recruitment, told the media that the "fruit problem" evaluated the performance of candidates under pressure, their ability to open up unfamiliar situations and their ability to actively communicate with others.

But because no one eats fruit, all the candidates get zero on this question. "What we want to see most is that students pick up fruits, take the initiative to distribute them to examiners and other applicants, and then eat some naturally."

In the net post interview reminder, "fruit problem" and "broom problem" are in the same breath.

The so-called "broom problem" refers to putting a broom horizontally at the door of the interview to see if the candidate will stand up and test his sense of responsibility. Analyze the fruit problem and examine the psychological quality and sharing ability of candidates under pressure. In addition, there are "hand-in questions" and "lunch questions" on the Internet, saying that the applicant will invite the applicant to dinner inadvertently. But the test is the applicant's carefulness, including how many jiaozi are in a plate and how much stuffing each has.

Netizen: Candidates don't eat fruit for reasonable reasons.

For this recruitment method, most netizens don't buy it.

Some netizens think that the examination questions are not scientific at all. It is impolite to be interviewed while eating fruit, let alone share other people's things everywhere, which is not in line with the traditional etiquette culture in China.

Netizen "the weak attraction of cats" said: "This question should give the interviewer a zero. A variety of hypotheses can be put forward, such as' the applicant can't eat fruit because of his poor stomach' and' can't eat fruit after meals'. More importantly, as an interviewer, he just set obstacles and observed, and did not invite candidates to eat fruit and then take it as guidance first. "

Good girl HR, a netizen in Guangzhou who works in the human resources department, said: "If the employment of candidates is arbitrarily decided based on such a situational problem, then many units use various recruitment tests tools with little knowledge, resulting in many people misunderstanding the' situational interview' method and some testing tools, and entering a major misunderstanding of the' examination strategy'."

Huang Lijun, a senior trainer of Guangzhou Tiantuo Training College, also believes that there are reasonable reasons why candidates don't eat fruit, such as unsanitary and dislike eating.