Is there a so-called blacklist for enterprises or recruitment units? Let some people can't find jobs.

Forward an article for your reference:

In many industries, HR has an invisible "blacklist" for some employees who leave for "special reasons". The so-called blacklist is more based on an industry or a specific field within an industry, which does not mean that all industries may have it. Usually, there are the following blacklists:

1. Special industry blacklist. Because the "information" known by the public is limited, even some information is difficult to be fully disclosed or has certain professionalism. The blacklist of this industry, such as teachers and doctors, depends more on public opinion or word of mouth.

2. Blacklist of industries with high turnover rate. Afraid of people on the "blacklist", the interests of enterprises will be damaged, or management will be difficult. Within a specific scope, form a similar alliance nature and exchange professional information, such as retail, some SP industries, tourism, IT industries, etc. The blacklist of such people has one thing in common, that is, their professional viability is relatively poor, and it is difficult to develop across industries if they leave the industry, thus forming shared information resources within the alliance and avoiding the loss of corporate interests.

3. Man-made blacklist. This situation is quite special, because employees who break up with the company because of work or other reasons (such as salary and turnover grade), the company starts from protecting the company's interests and uses its influence in the industry to artificially create a so-called blacklist to crack down on such employees and create difficulties for their future development; The second is to set an example and warn other employees not to forget this lesson and obey the company's arrangement reasonably. Such blacklisting incidents are not uncommon. For example, employees of a company are suspected of using the company's resources to develop their own careers, being expelled from the company and even widely publicized by the media. The credibility of this blacklist needs to be considered.

Observation or analysis point

After the rumor of "blacklist" occurred, an anonymous investigation was conducted on whether it was fair for several multinational retail enterprises to share the "blacklist" of resigned employees. A total of 1 1085 people participated, of which 77.9% thought the blacklist was unfair, 15.4% thought it was fair, and 6.7% thought it was hard to say.

Although most people think that the blacklist is unfair, it is an open secret in the industry. After all, blacklisting is not "hanging red flowers on the red list", which may not be a good thing for enterprises, because this behavior itself will affect the evaluation of corporate integrity, and then affect the reputation and social image of enterprises. Some companies that threaten employees with blacklists as "trump cards" will also be included in the blacklist of job seekers.

As a professional, while reflecting on yourself, we should also face up to our past shortcomings, communicate frankly with new employers, and strive to seize the next opportunity. When you leave this company, it may not be a bad thing. If you change your profession and identity, the shadow may not follow you.

Of course, it is undeniable that enterprises are absolutely dominant in the so-called blacklist. For professionals, there is only one way that is the real thoroughfare: strive to enhance their own value and make enterprises unwilling to give up themselves.