Why are people with 9 years of service pointed out by HR that their experience is 0?

I believe everyone must have experienced such a thing, that is, when you were interviewing, the people you interviewed in front of had many years of service, but when HR asked him about his industry knowledge, those people always hesitated to answer directly. Such people are often defined by HR as people with zero work experience, but it is not difficult to find from their resumes that they have worked in a company for 9 years. But why do you think they have no experience? Let me briefly introduce them below.

First of all, we must understand a basic common sense that there is no necessary relationship between work experience and working hours. Some people have just left campus and experienced things that many people have never experienced. Although they have no so-called qualifications, their experience far exceeds others. And some people stayed in the company for 10 years, but in this 10 year, they didn't really do their job well, but they were addicted to interpersonal relationships and flattery, and didn't really know their own industry, so although they worked for 10 years, their experience was basically zero.

Second, there are many people who have been engaged in a single job 10 years, but in fact their work experience has basically not increased. Just like a waiter in a restaurant, he carries dishes, washes dishes and cleans up every day. It is not so much work experience as muscle memory. Although they have 10 years of service, their actual work experience is basically zero.

Therefore, we need to redefine work experience. It doesn't mean that the longer a person works, the richer his work experience will be. Everyone's experience is directly proportional to what they have experienced, but not necessarily to the length of service.