Secretaries in recruitment and board of directors offices of large pharmaceutical companies require employees to be under 20 years old. Is the age limit for employees considered employment discriminat

Secretaries in recruitment and board of directors offices of large pharmaceutical companies require employees to be under 20 years old. Is the age limit for employees considered employment discrimination?

The recruitment office secretary of a large pharmaceutical company requires employees to be under 20 years old. Is the age limit for employees considered employment discrimination? This should be considered discrimination.

There is a two-way choice relationship between the employer and the employee. Before you enter a company, you will use the Internet to evaluate the size of the company, its reputation in the industry, and the employment opportunities for the chosen position. Requirements, etc. You have done your homework and understanding on the Internet, and you have a general understanding of the employer. When you go to this company for an interview, you will finally ask the examiner about the general work content of the new job, and your The direction of promotion and development, your salary and benefits, etc. This is what you know about the company. The same company knows nothing about you when it faces you. It can only judge you from the resume you filled in, which requires you to fill in your personal education, age, gender, previous work experience, etc. Understand and determine whether you match the requirements of the recruitment position to determine whether to hire you. This is equal, equal understanding between both parties. If it is just a simple understanding of the employees, then there is no discrimination!

If there is discrimination, it is that many companies set educational thresholds, such as a bachelor's degree or above, and those with lower academic qualifications are excluded; they also set experience requirements, such as more than a few years of work experience in the same position in the same industry. , then freshly graduated college students have no advantage; set gender requirements, such as "must be male or male is preferred", then when the conditions are equal or even better, women are often turned away by employers simply because of gender issues; Set age requirements: For example, under 40 years old. This has caused a large number of "4050" workers to find jobs difficult. From the perspective of the enterprise, these series of regulations are set up to reduce the enterprise's employment costs, but to a certain extent, they also cause discrimination against some employees. Especially regarding some gender and age restrictions, if the employer has these settings, it will invisibly discriminate against some groups of people.

I think the biggest discrimination when employing people is "whether they are married and have children"; the requirement to submit a physical examination report; this causes great employment discrimination against some women who are married but have no children, and are not married and have no children. , even some married women with children will be asked whether they will have a second child. A physical examination report must be submitted and some functional tests are required. Although the state has begun to regulate these aspects, workers are always in a weak position during the interview process. It is the workers who are ultimately harmed by these discriminations. These are completely blatant employment discrimination.