Debate often tests common sense.

No ~ ~ never! ! ! !

Personally speaking, debate is a quarrel between sven. In the debate field, the ultimate goal is not to convince the other side, but to convince the judges ~ ~ and you can understand the debate after you figure this out.

To win the judges, we must talk big and analyze our views from the general ideological level, theoretical level and factual level.

More use of medical logic will make your debate more exciting.

In addition, in the free debate, to win the favor of the judges, you can be humorous and pay attention to propriety. . I will gradually realize this measure ~ ~ Hehe ~ ~ ~

All manual entries ~ ~ Answer finished ~ ~ Hehe ~

2. What are the basic knowledge of debate?

1, the process of debate generally has three stages: beginning, unfolding and ending. Without any of these stages, it is not a complete debate. Therefore, a complete debate should generally consist of four parts: topic, argument, rebuttal and conclusion;

There are two or more different parties in the debate. Only when there are two or more parties with different opinions can ideological confrontation be achieved. It is impossible for a person to argue with himself. The balance and comparison of several schemes or practices in a person's mind is thinking or guessing rather than debating;

3, the debate must be aimed at the same thing or the same problem, that is, have the same topic. If the topics discussed by all parties are different, it is impossible to achieve a meaningful debate. Because these two objects of judgment are the same, and their ideas are opposite, at most, only one can be true, but not both. In this way, there will be a question of who is right and who is wrong, which will inevitably lead to controversy;

4. All parties in the debate have more or less * * * consensus or * * common premise, such as the identity of thinking, the law of non-contradiction, law of excluded middle's law of sufficient reason and the correct reasoning method, as well as social axioms, scientific laws and other true and false standards and value orientations.

Extended data

1, debate skills, mainly the following:

(1), setting a dilemma: that is, setting a dilemma, whether you answer this or that, you will be passive. But be sure to aim at the topic, don't groan without illness;

(2) Active extension: that is, extending a fact or a sentence of the other party, causing our initiative and the other party's passivity;

(3) Attacking the shield with a spear: that is, revealing the contradiction between the other party's argument and argument, the contradiction between this debater and that debater's statement, the contradiction between answering this question and answering that question, or other contradictions, making it embarrassing and embarrassing;

(4) Returning to the absurd question: that is, extending one's own argument or argument or other questions to absurdity, getting stuck in it and being passive, unable to save oneself.

(5) The short topic is profound. That is, the question is simple, but profound and closely related to the debate. It is difficult to answer accurately, but it is embarrassing if you can't answer, and it is easy to be passive if you guess the answer is inaccurate.

References:

Sogou encyclopedia-debate

3. Debate Competition: Do you study for exams or knowledge?

Knowledge must be ...

in principle ...

As the saying goes, it's never too old to learn ... not too old to pass the exam. ...

It means learning knowledge. ...

Companies and employers also need knowledge.

Whether living or making money, knowledge is the most important thing.

There are all kinds of little knowledge in life ... from ordinary family's oil, salt, sauce, vinegar and tea to escape in distress ... all knowledge.

In work and business, knowledgeable people can exchange knowledge for money. People without knowledge can only buy knowledge with money. ...

Although all kinds of examinations are used for recruitment at home and abroad ...

However, exams at home and abroad are different. ...

So there will be such a misunderstanding of the exam in China. ...

This is a misunderstanding ... It must be emphasized that ...

Domestic examinations are also aimed at selecting outstanding talents.

In the final analysis, his purpose is to master the knowledge of the school. ...

Just because the system is not perfect, it has become a one-sided investigation. ...

Including quality education promoted by the Ministry of Education (although it is still being promoted)

But only because of system problems and social environment problems ... has this become a test? ...

For example, abroad

There is an interview question asking why the manhole cover is round.

This is not mentioned in the book ... it involves the problem of knowledge ... one is the concept of great knowledge ... and the other is logical ability. Can you answer with your own view of knowledge? .. there is no standard answer. ...

The same is true of topics like the FBI exam. ...

Therefore, mastering knowledge is the fundamental way to become an outstanding talent. ...

From the perspective of the opponent's debate, you may have to take the exam in every position, which is more suitable for future survival.

Then you can give another example, a Kao Ba and a person who melts learning into life. ...

All enter the same unit, and the latter must stand out in the end ... because it can stand the test. ...

To say the least, even if I was admitted to Pakistan, the latter failed. ...

Then Kao Ba didn't adapt to working life ... because people left school for nearly half their lives and entered the work unit. But the work needs not only the theoretical accomplishment and professional knowledge of the school that the unit has been admitted to. . He also needs a lot of knowledge such as interpersonal communication.

At this time, the advantages of the latter are reflected.

In one's life, it is extremely important to reflect one's own life value.

Generally speaking, the latter has many advantages over Kao Ba in embodying the value of life.

Because reflecting the value of life depends on your own knowledge. Whether it is professional knowledge, interpersonal knowledge, or life knowledge, etc.

He has a wider range and stronger adaptability. ...

So the importance is self-evident ...

So the importance of knowledge is so strong, should learning be for learning knowledge?

You don't have to say much. ...

4. Provide some common sense about the debate

Argumentation tactical debate in the debate consists of two basic links: argumentation (defense) and refutation, in which argumentation is to prove one's basic position and is the basis and necessary ladder of refutation.

If there is no necessary argument in the debate, the rebuttal will appear unreasonable and pale. Moreover, if your argument is unstable in the debate, you will naturally be attacked by the other side, not to mention attacking the other side. It can be seen that the quality of the argument is directly related to the success or failure of the debate.

Therefore, we should pay special attention to strengthening argumentation in the debate. The following briefly introduces several argumentation tactics: strict logic and strict framework. In argumentation, use strict logical thinking to build a strict theoretical framework, so as to make your argumentation solid.

Rigorous, without any loopholes, this is the key to winning the debate. For example, in the "Wan Jiale Cup" TV Debate Competition, the topic of the debate between the Peking University team and the Institute of International Relations is: "At this stage, China should encourage private cars."

The key to this topic is the words "car", "encouragement" and "the present stage of our country". How to find out the logical relationship among them and form a strong argument is the key to build a strict attack and defense system.

Finally, the team of Peking University, as the square, according to its internal logical connection, deduces the idea that developing automobile industry in the emerging stage is one of the leading directions of China's industrial development. Due to the characteristics of "three highs and one fast", the automobile industry has been proved to be the most powerful booster for economic take-off, and the quality and output of automobiles are also signs to measure the development level of a country.

China is no exception. In order to promote industrial development, we must develop the automobile industry. Secondly, the key to the development of the automobile industry lies in the market.

The most convenient way to expand the automobile market is to let cars "fly into the homes of ordinary people". Therefore, there is an inevitable connection between the automobile industry and encouraging private purchase.

On this basis, according to their own inevitable logical connection, they fully demonstrated the realistic possibility and necessity of "encouraging purchase", and fully considered the possible questions raised in the other party's argument (that is, whether the road traffic congestion in China and the private consumption of cars will be a luxury consumption tendency), and made careful and reasonable preparations for them one by one. Because the team of Peking University has established its own argumentation system by making full use of strict logical thinking and ensuring the rigor and thoroughness of the system, their argumentation is both tenable and defensible in practice and has received good results.

Surprise in the debate, "breaking" and "standing" are, in the final analysis, a contest between knowledge and ingenuity. If one party in the debate can give full play to his knowledge and intelligence, break through the defense line of the other party's argument on the basis of thorough analysis of the argument, and skillfully put forward a brand-new concept, thus giving the opponent a "surprise", which can greatly weaken the opponent's aggression. For example, the 94 Changhong Cup National Debate Competition for College Students, and the Nanjing University team played against the Jilin University team. As a positive side, the position of Jilin Brigade is that the primary criterion for college graduates to choose their jobs is to give full play to their personal specialties.

As the opposing party, Nanlv has many ideas, such as "the primary standard is social demand", "rich income" and "interests". But these are all too common and may fall into the fierce attack prepared by Kyrgyzstan. You said "social needs", he said that choosing a job is a subjective behavior, and "giving full play to one's personal strengths" is only to better meet "social needs", and you said "rich income". He said: when the opposition party needs to support its motherland most, it is sad and disappointing to bargain with the people first for its own interests! In this way, the South Brigade will be unable to cope.

Finally, after careful consideration, Nanlv put forward an extremely bold concept: college students' job selection is complex and diverse, and there is no and should not be a unified primary standard! It also points out that if there is no evidence to prove that college students should have a unified primary standard in choosing a job, it is undoubtedly Gai Lou on quicksand to emphasize that this primary standard is "giving full play to one's personal specialties". When this language came out, it caused an uproar.

Because Nanlv's point of view fundamentally shook the other side's carefully designed argument, Jilv was caught off guard and suddenly lost its foothold, so that it was hardly refuted in the normative speech. While breaking each other with unprecedented innovation courage, NTU further clarified its argument that college students should take personal self-improvement and social progress as their career choice direction.

In this way, Nanlv quickly took the initiative on the field and received very obvious results on the field. Li's other method is hard. When there are some arguments that are difficult to demonstrate logically or theoretically in the debate, we have to adopt the "Li Ying" method and introduce new concepts to solve the difficulties.

For example, the debate about "AIDS is a medical problem, not a social problem" is very difficult to argue, because AIDS is both a medical problem and a social problem, and it is difficult to completely separate the two problems from common sense. When dealing with this problem, Fudan University first made the following assumptions: if they were allowed to debate the case, they would introduce the new concept of "social impact", thus affirming that AIDS has a certain "social impact", but it is not a "social problem", and strictly determining the meaning of "social impact", so that it is difficult for the other party to attack.

Later in the debate, they drew a gesture of opposition, explaining that "AIDS is a social problem." This is not a medical problem. In this case, it is unreasonable to completely deny that AIDS is a medical problem. Therefore, they introduced the concept of "medical approach" in the debate, emphasizing the use of "social system engineering" to solve AIDS, and in this project, "medical approach" is one of the necessary components.

In this way, their room for manoeuvre will be large, and the other side will spend a lot of effort to entangle in the concept put forward by itself, and the attack power will be greatly weakened. The significance of this tactic is to introduce a new concept to deal with the other side, so as to ensure that some key concepts in your argument are hidden behind and not directly attacked by the other side.

Less definition, more description. In argumentation (defense), we often encounter an unavoidable fact, that is, defining the concept. It can be said that definition is to clarify our basic views and clarify our basic position.

5. Common sense necessary to become a debater

A debater is a person who explains his views on things or problems with certain reasons, exposes the contradictions of the other party, and finally gets the correct understanding or recognition of the other party.

A debater must meet five conditions:

Including: listening to and mastering each other's arguments;

Understand each other's arguments to evaluate each other's next deployment;

Analyze the shortcomings of the other party's argument and put forward your own argument;

Think quickly in order to express your arguments in a compact debate in real time and concisely;

Only by calming down can we organize our thoughts systematically and methodically and make our arguments more convincing.

In addition, I think the debater must do:

1。 You should look at the arguments of other debaters first and learn from them.

2。 You should often take part in debates, right?

3。 Calm in case of trouble should be one.

4。 Learn the art of speaking.

If it doesn't meet your requirements, please keep asking questions and I will definitely answer them for you. In addition, I hope my answer is helpful to you.

6. Debate knowledge learning:

I. Debate Competition Procedure (to be executed by the Chairman)

1, preface

2. When the players enter the stadium, introduce the teams and their positions, introduce the players, and introduce the judges and their guests.

3. The game has started

After the jury submitted the score table, they withdrew from the comment.

5. The judges are seated and the guests comment on the competition.

6. Announce the results of the competition (including the best players)

Second, the study of debating skills.

(1) Leverage

(2) grafting

(3) Go with the flow

(d) root causes.

(5) cut the bottom wages.

(6) attack its key points.

(7) Using contradictions

(8) "Draw the snake out of the hole"

(9) Li Jiang

(10) plan to slow down the troops.

Please list at least ten debates that interest you.

Examinations are needed to explore talents, but they are not needed to explore talents.

Martial arts should be kept secret, but martial arts should not be kept secret

Ideal talents are based on benevolence, while ideal talents are based on wisdom.

The network has more advantages than disadvantages for college students. The influence of network on college students does more harm than good.

The pursuit of money and morality can go hand in hand.

Put an end to piracy, consumers are more important than * * * to put an end to piracy, and * * * is more important than consumers.

Personality needs to be pursued deliberately, not deliberately.

Loose management does more harm than good to college students.

Returning to China after studying abroad is a personal problem, not a social problem, but a social problem, not a personal problem.

Popular literature is more influential than literary masterpieces. Great literary masterpieces are more influential than popular literature.

Please simulate a written debate.

Debate: Which is more important, self-discipline or heteronomy?

Pro: Self-discipline is more important than heteronomy.

Against: Heteronomy is more important than self-discipline.

To say "heteronomy", it can be said that everyone always has something he can't see and must rely on the help of others.

Like your back, you can't see it without the help of others or tools.

-This is affirming the role of heteronomy, but paving the way for self-discipline.

In life, people have many blind spots like "their own back", which must be pointed out by others. However, others can say that I am just not self-disciplined. What will happen? -It's conceivable!

Even Kong Old Master Q, known as a saint, should "save three times a day" and be strict with himself.

Even a master has to practice until he is 70 years old to "do whatever he wants without overstepping the rules"-as a middle school student, can we say that "self-discipline" can be delayed? ! ! ……

Middle school students, who are in the youthful and energetic age, can't be as well constrained in everything as mature adults-because young people should try boldly and seek knowledge, which is one of the reasons why middle school students have hope for the motherland in our nature (if middle school students in a certain place are old pedants, is there still youthful motivation in this place? )

Therefore, for middle school students, self-discipline is undoubtedly more important than forcing heteronomy. ...

There is always a place where heteronomy "goes out of service"-who will help us with heteronomy when we are alone and no one is watching? ! But "self-discipline" is a kind of good quality from the heart, which is with us anytime and anywhere. You can achieve 7 times 24, "seamless docking" and "full network coverage"-only "self-discipline" can do this! ! !

Note: Self-discipline is to help us, not to limit us. A person who knows how to use self-discipline well is more likely to succeed.

Of course, we are not saying that heteronomy is not important. On the contrary, we emphasized the importance of heteronomy from the beginning, but there is something more important than heteronomy, that is, self-discipline-only self-discipline can really accompany us and help us all the time.

I'll tell you a little joke and see if it can be used to enliven the atmosphere and embellish your defense:

There is a saying that monks worship Buddha, and the Buddha is truly moved. The Buddha appeared and said to him, If you have any questions about Buddhism, just ask.

The old monk asked: Excuse me, Buddha, do you also worship Buddha?

Buddha said: Yes.

Old monk: Which Buddha do you worship?

Buddha: Worship Buddha.

Old monk: Isn't that to worship yourself?

Buddha: Yes, it is better to ask for help than to ask for help. ...

I found the above on the internet.

7. It is more important to accumulate knowledge in debate than to cultivate ability.

Whose side are you on?

The former seems inferior, but it has a better chance to show off its disadvantages.

If you solve the problem from other angles, the other party will definitely say, "Baidu knows all the so-called knowledge, and you will have it as soon as you look it up."

So, you seem to have lost.

However, knowledge accumulation is not just these things on the internet, it is farther and deeper.

For example, it seems that all abilities need knowledge accumulation as the foundation, that is, 1 If you don't have enough knowledge, you can solve problems as long as you understand and master knowledge and become wisdom and ability. That is, ability contains knowledge, and knowledge is only a point in ability.

How to prove that this point is greater than what contains him?

8. Debate knowledge learning: debate knowledge learning: 1. Please list the debate process 2. Debate skills.

Competition process of political debate

1. Opening remarks of the host 2. Introduce teams and players. Introduce the judges and guests. The host announced the rules of the game. Make an argument. Refute argument 7. Under the leadership of the moderator, both sides of the debate are free to debate 8. Host, please invite the respondent.

9. Head-on defense 10. The opponent accepts the defense 1 1. Start a free debate from the opposing side.

12. Positive concluding statement 13. Negative summary statement 14. The judges left the discussion results on the spot, commented and announced the results.

Research on debating skills

65438+

6. attack the key. 7. Use contradictions. 8. Draw the snake out of the hole. 9. Li is stiff. 10. Plan to slow down the troops

debate

1. Positive: Test scores can't judge whether students will have a good future. Negative: Test scores can judge whether students will have a good future.

2. Fact: The life of a giant panda is more important than human life. On the contrary: human life is more important than that of giant pandas.

Positive: Middle school students should use mobile phones at school. Negative: Middle school students should not use mobile phones at school.

Positive: Middle school students should listen to pop songs. Negative: Middle school students should not listen to pop songs.

5 positive: it is not good for middle school students to enter society too early: it is not good for middle school students to enter society too early.

The influence of QQ spirit on society is that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. The influence of QQ spirit on society is that the disadvantages outweigh the benefits.

7 positive: the advantages of spending money to send children to prestigious schools outweigh the disadvantages: the disadvantages of spending money to send children to prestigious schools outweigh the advantages.

8 positive: it is not good for middle school students to enter society too early: it is not good for middle school students to enter society too early.

Positive: Middle school students should pay attention to social opposition; middle school students should not pay attention to society.

10 Positive: Famous universities are the key to employment. Negative: Famous universities are not the key to employment.

Hehe, everyone is Donghua Ga.