The company asked for job-hopping five times, and it caused a heated discussion without sending a resume. Is it reasonable to limit the number of recruitment requirements?

The requirement for limiting the number of recruits is not only unreasonable, but also suspected of violating the labor law. The Employment Promotion Law stipulates that workers enjoy equal employment and the right to choose their own jobs according to law, and employers may not discriminate against workers on the basis of nationality, race, gender, religious beliefs and other factors. Although? Job-hopping era? It is not mentioned in the labor law, but its nature belongs to the same factor as nationality, race and gender. Therefore, if the recruitment enterprise discriminates against workers by the number of job-hopping, it is a violation of the labor law, and workers can file a lawsuit according to law.

It is understood that a netizen found a recruitment when posting a resume on a recruitment platform. Cross-border e-commerce procurement assistant? Is the e-commerce company of the post actually marked in the application conditions? People who have changed jobs more than five times? Don't put the word resume. The netizen shared this phenomenon on social platforms, which caused discussion among netizens. Who put it forward one after another? Is it unworthy to change jobs five times? ? Question. I have to say that such application conditions are really wonderful.

In view of the phenomenon that job requirements put forward wonderful conditions, some popular netizens deliberately searched the recruitment website and found that it was not only this employer who put forward wonderful requirements, but many units on the recruitment platform limited the number of job-hopping for candidates, and even some employers asked that the number of job-hopping should not exceed three times. Some professionals pointed out that in view of the phenomenon that employers limit the number of job-hopping in recruitment requirements, the recruitment platform should give guidance in a professional manner and prohibit employers from making such unreasonable and illegal recruitment requirements.

In fact, it is unreasonable for employers to limit the number of job-hopping from the perspective of knowing people. Because how many times a person changes jobs, there are not only personal reasons, but also the reasons of the employer. Not every boss is a good boss, and not every unit is a good unit. If you find that this unit is not suitable for you to stay at all during your work, it is natural to resign decisively. Therefore, it is unscientific, unreasonable and illegal to judge a person's ability or so-called stability only by the number of job-hopping.

?