New youth social construction

"China History" in the Eyes of the New Youth Annual Meeting

Since ancient times, it has been said that "those who steal hooks will be punished, those who steal countries will be vassals, and the door of vassals will be benevolent." "The poet Cao Song also said in The Book of Changes:" Don't talk about it! "The phenomenon described by the two men is fierce today.

In order to guard against thieves who pry boxes, pick out pockets and open cabinets, we should tie the rope and turn off the knob, which is what the secular calls cleverness. But the thief came. He carried the cabinet, the box, the pocket and left, for fear that the rope and knob were not strong. Don't you think cleverness is stupid in front of thieves? In this way, doesn't a rule save for traitors and thieves? If for the benefit of the party, regardless of the sufferings of the people, relying on high-handed means and the guidance of public opinion, turning black and white, confusing beauty and ugliness, and referring to deer as a horse, no regime will last long. Only the implementation of the concept of democracy and the concept of * * * can ensure the long-term stability of the regime to the country.

In eastern civilization, what is democracy and what is its connotation? Can developing countries, especially China with special national conditions, break through the bottleneck of their own political development, break Huang Zongxi's law and realize this idea? If yes, how long will it take?

Xu Dong, the former secretary-general of the New Youth Association, once discussed this: "* * * and" is a kind of governance, and the appearance of this governance is related to Li Wang's loss of ruling ability, which makes up for Li Wang's ruling vacancy and has the nature of alternative governance, so the word "* * * and" has the nature of a verb. * * *' refers to the cooperation of two or more people, and the word' and' comes from the mouth of the whole grain, which refers to the mouth of the consortium where the whole grain is mixed together (in ancient times, there was a wine mixer called' Heng', which was specially used to mix all kinds of wine brewed from the whole grain to achieve the best taste. The word comes from rice bowl, which refers to grain and rice bowl refers to container. The principle of word formation is the same as' and'. Therefore, if politics is compared to everyone's tastes and governance is compared to reconciling everyone's tastes, then' * * * and' means that two or more people cooperate to reconcile the tastes of the public, thus meeting the requirements of the public all over the world.

China experienced thousands of years of long feudal rule. Generally speaking, suffering is greater than happiness, and the power of stagnation is greater than the power of progress. Why is the feudal society in China so long? History, especially reality, puts this grim topic in front of people and urgently demands an answer. Regrettably, such an important research topic has long been treated with undue contempt and cold shoulder, let alone solved correctly. From the founding of People's Republic of China (PRC) to the Cultural Revolution, only dozens of papers were published on this topic. Compared with other historical topics (such as ancient history by stages, peasant wars, etc.). ), this figure is almost zero. This problem has begun to attract people's attention and research. As far as all the papers published on 20 12 are concerned, they basically express their opinions and have not caused any controversy.

The author summarizes the expositions of Deng Tuo, Fu Yiling and Xu, and thinks that there are four reasons:

First, China's feudal society, where land was privately owned and allowed to be bought and sold freely, resulted in the trinity of landlords, usurers and commercial capitalists. Commercial capital is parasitic in the feudal mode of production and cannot be decomposed and eliminated.

Secondly, the slow growth of agricultural population, coupled with the cruel exploitation of the landlord class, warlord melee, foreign invasion and so on. It has greatly slowed down the speed of population growth, and since there is no pressure of full population, there is no need to increase productivity.

Third, centralized autocracy has existed for a long time, with boundless power, monopolizing almost all production departments and seriously interfering with economic development.

Fourth, economy, politics and ideology are highly centralized and unified, forming an ultra-stable system; On the one hand, the interaction of the three causes the periodic oscillation of society, on the other hand, it makes the society return to its original stable and stagnant state through this oscillation. This ultra-stable system has conservative characteristics, which is not conducive to innovation and development.

History has proved that only a wider and more direct universal suffrage can completely break the cycle of chaos control in China and bring China's political system into line with the world.

Some people may ask: But when will universal suffrage be implemented? If the government has been refusing to return the government to the people on the pretext of "the country's population is too large, the economy and culture are backward, and the people's level of consciousness is not high enough", is it also a disguised feudal autocracy?

We should be soberly aware that at the beginning of the founding of New China, the population base was large, the population quality was low and the territory was vast, but the educational resources were uneven. It is true that people in some places still live above the subsistence level. As the saying goes, "a warehouse can know etiquette, and you can know honor and disgrace if you have enough food and clothing." Only when the means of per capita survival and development are highly developed and people no longer regard food and clothing as the fundamental problem of "personal life" will the time for universal suffrage be ripe.

Judging from the present situation, China has been reforming and opening for 30 years and People's Republic of China (PRC) has been established for 60 years. The economic strength of our country and the educational level of the people have undergone fundamental changes, which can be said to have laid a material and cultural foundation for the external environment of universal suffrage. We are very close to universal suffrage.

However, at this stage, the government's talent standard and selection system, the people's elite consciousness, and the prosperous ethics in social and educational institutions are not scientific, and even derailed from the world's advanced civilization.

On this issue, Xu Dong, former secretary-general of the New Youth Association, summed up and supplemented the views of independent political scientists and economists Song Zhaolai and Gao Quanxi, and thought that there were mainly the following ten problems:

First, the resistance of talent standards and specific implementation. Education is not equal to talents, education is not equal to talents, birth is not equal to talents, professional titles are not equal to talents, officials are not equal to talents, and English plus computers are not equal to talents. There is not much difference between the top and the academic elite. The biggest resistance mainly comes from the society and the lower classes, especially those who have little knowledge, but this is not the biggest resistance. The biggest resistance mainly comes from the specific implementation process. In the selection and recruitment of talents, in fact, the mainstream still follows the traditional talent standards. The standards of high education, deep qualifications, good family background, English and computer skills still dominate people's subconscious. The selection criteria that do not pay attention to practical ability and work performance are still common, and they do not pay attention to both ability and political integrity. The open, fair, just and eclectic mechanism for selecting talents is far from universal and truly effective.

Second, learning to be excellent is an official. China society is still an "official-oriented" society, and the official road is the brightest and most direct channel at present, which holds most social resources and is at the top of society. Because there is no balanced talent evaluation system and salary distribution mechanism in China, many talents suitable for academic work are squeezed into officialdom. As a result, officials can't do well, and a group of scholars are flooding, which can be described as killing two birds with one stone!

Third, the abnormal flow of talents. At present, there are as many as 5.28 million civil servants in government agencies and institutions and 30 million public institutions. Basically, they can't get in or out, but they can't get up. This abnormal investment and upward trend has been maintained for decades. This situation has caused unqualified talents not to be eliminated, but to breed a strange circle in which mediocre talents hold power and exclude outstanding talents, making outstanding talents unable to stand out and even assimilating a large number of outstanding talents. The rational flow mechanism of talents is far from being formed.

Fourth, the aging of talents. There are too few young talents in China. Young talents often fail to emerge, and heroes are useless. In officialdom, the personnel power is almost entirely in the superior, and the competition mechanism is not sufficient, which makes excellent young talents have no room to display at all, while the old talents are difficult to make a difference because of the limitations of energy, knowledge and times, which seriously hinders the progress of society and the vitality of academia.

Fifth, the imbalance between loss and input. Since the reform and opening up, the flow of talents has been frequent and access opportunities have increased. Today, globalization is a normal world trend. But for China, from 1980s to 2002, 580,000 people in China went abroad to study, and only 1.5 million returned home. Talent is not only lost abroad, but also with the landing of multinational companies in China, the localization of talents is becoming increasingly obvious, and the competition for high-level talents between foreign-funded enterprises and R&D institutions is extremely fierce. In recent years, there has been a lot of brain drain, but there are also hidden dangers. The elite is basically lost, the good and the bad are mixed, and the relative number is also decreasing. In particular, the brain drain of some key technologies and secrets is a huge loss.

Sixth, corruption is the natural enemy of talents. The official corruption in China today, especially the personnel corruption, is obvious to all. Corruption in officialdom directly leads to many outstanding talents who are dissatisfied with social reality and leave other countries or are unwilling to coexist with them, or even if they squeeze into officialdom, they are often frustrated and unable to make a difference, or they have lived in officialdom for a long time and are gradually alienated and reduced to the same kind. Employing corruption directly excludes outstanding talents and systems, making it impossible for them to vote for the country. Corruption marginalizes and democratizes real talents. Over time, the talents of the ruling authorities are exhausted, while the opposite talents are increasing and gradually forming groups. In this way, the disintegration of the regime is a foregone conclusion, and the period is not far away.

Seventh, the selection of talents is upward and exclusive. Some cadres are mostly nominated by superiors, which is called nomination, but they are just going through the motions, or they are decided by superiors. Public nominations and elections are often excluded. There are many candidates from party member among cadres, but few candidates from democratic parties or democratic parties have no real power.

Eighth, the distribution mechanism is unreasonable. Shanghai institutions closely combine income distribution with individual job responsibilities and performance contributions, and decouple from professional titles, academic qualifications and qualifications. It is a scientific evaluation of talents' contribution and value that income follows posts, but it is a pity that the latter three methods are still the basis of distribution, which is not conducive to outstanding talents to stand out, get rid of the disadvantages of seniority, and realize the talent development model with the goal of pursuing ability.

Ninth, the two-point theory and dichotomy view of history and people's understanding have not been established or are very immature, and the method of evaluating talents is still' black and white', wandering in the extreme debate between gentlemen and villains, which is unrealistic. Leading to mediocrity or darkness of leading cadres.

Tenth, morality is manipulative, condescending and one-way. This is far from universal morality. (Author Press: For details, please refer to "Several Suggestions on Improving Zhao Danyang's Moral Dilemma", which can be directly searched by Baidu)

Conception of building the new youth club into an "online university"

Zhao Danyang, president of the New Youth Association, pointed out that in view of the above ten drawbacks, it is urgent to take "three prohibitions and four declines", "five counts and four noes" and "seven righteousness and nine weakness" as the guiding ideology of talent selection, "no preparation, no family background, no care about grievances and enmities" as the purpose of employing people. The four-step strategy of the New Youth Club is to change the traditional culture, adapt to local conditions, criticize and inherit, make the past serve the present, and it is an advanced theoretical achievement of facing the world, learning from others' strengths, taking myself as the mainstay and eclecticism. It's "Gramsci" (Gramsci Antonio (189 1 ~ 1937), Italian.

The four-step strategy embodies that our party always represents the development requirements of China's advanced productive forces, the orientation of China's advanced culture and the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the people in China, which is the foundation of our party's development, reform and strength.

The advanced nature of the new youth club lies in vigorously carrying forward the theoretical achievements of combining Marxist philosophy with China's political civilization, and implementing the four-step strategy, which will not waver for 20 years.

The source of theoretical advocacy is "university".

The university proposed by the New Youth Association is by no means a university in the general sense (that is, a school that implements higher education, a higher education institution that provides teaching and research conditions and authorizes the awarding of degrees, including colleges, colleges and comprehensive universities. )

History of rites and music in Han Dynasty: "The kings in ancient times took education as their major task, established universities to teach the country, and made urgent orders to change the city."

The Anti-Classics also said: "People with virtue may not be able to make progress; An enterprising person is not necessarily virtuous. Did Chen Ping do anything? Is Su Qin loyal? However, Chen Pingding Hanye, Su Weak Yan, let it grow! "

In view of this, the New Youth Club defines the "university" in the new era as: an institution that studies advanced knowledge, where there is talent, it should not be prepared, regardless of family background or hatred. This includes the elite forces in society to the greatest extent. (including entrepreneurs, scientists, inventors, writers, gentry, civilians, etc. Low level of education)

The purpose of establishing an online university by the New Youth Club is to recruit outstanding talents from all walks of life, popularize advanced culture and democratic knowledge to the public through social elites, establish a promotion ladder for talented people in society, and lay a solid cultural foundation and public support for promoting universal suffrage.